|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, November 21, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Anti-Mori motion falls through
By F. J. Khergamvala
TOKYO, NOV. 20. An Opposition move to unseat the Government
headed by the Prime Minister, Mr. Yoshiro Mori, through a no-
confidence motion fizzled out for lack of support and ended in
pandemonium in Parliament.
After considerable confusion about where he stood, the main
challenger, Mr. Koichi Kato, from within Mr. Mori's ruling
Liberal Democratic Party, came before the cameras at a hotel at
nearly 10.30 p.m. (local time) and announced, ``I tried my best
to change the leadership, but as I had always maintained, my
efforts would be directed from within the party. Unfortunately,
the best laid plans cannot succeed if there is absence of
numbers.'' With those words, Mr. Kato asked his backers to stay
away from the vote on the no-confidence motion.
Mr. Kato's main supporter, Mr. Taku Yamasaki, too bowed before
the absence of numerical support, rather than rush to do battle
on unequal terms. These comments, conceding to the intimidation
of the ranks by the big guns within the ruling party, were in
sharp contrast to Mr. Kato's confidence earlier in the day. ``We
will have an evening of decisive battle'', said Mr Kato on Monday
morning, as he mobilised his political forces to challenge Mr.
Mori.
Throughout the day, back-room manipulators were preoccupied
mustering the numbers and at the same time trying to work out a
deal. It would not be surprising that the final deal includes
that Mr. Mori must abdicate quite early, possibly immediately
after the lower House adjourns on Dec. 1. For Mr. Mori, any deal
to remove him would be an act of political euthanasia.
The Opposition required 50 seats from the Kato and Yamasaki
allies to adopt the no-confidence motion. As the Kato and
Yamasaki factions did their internal calculations, they were also
negotiating deals on a compromise that would allow them not burn
bridges with the parent party. Even as the debate on the
Opposition motion was about to begin and Mr. Kato's emissary, a
senior LDP figure, had hammered out a deal with the Mori backers,
Mr. Kato told mediapersons that he and his supporters would
abstain, not support the motion to oust Mr. Mori.
An hour later, he reversed himself, saying he and Mr. Yamasaki
would support the motion, but asked both faction members to
abstain. A few minutes later, perhaps responding to a real time
feedback on numbers, Mr. Kato and Mr. Yamasaki backtracked again,
reverting to abstention. In the end, just before the beginning of
the plenary session to debate the no-confidence motion,
discretion was seen to be the enduring option.
All the number crunching done by analysts showed a very close
contest on whether Mr. Mori and the LDP's mainstream factions
could weather a no-confidence motion by the four Opposition
parties, supported formally by elements from within the LDP.
Asahi TV and Mainichi surveys showed a clear majority in favour
of ousting Mr. Mori. The media seemed to view as the best
compromise an outcome where Mr. Kato ought not to be the
immediate replacement.
Irrespective of the result in favour of Mr. Mori, he is doomed.
For him personally, and the LDP it is a Pyrrhic victory that
again exposed everything negative about it. As Mr. Yukio
Hatoyama, the head of the main Opposition Democratic Party said,
``the very birth of the Mori Cabinet was suspicious. Now there
are behind-the-scenes moves within the party to remove Mori.''
For the most part, Mr. Mori himself was a helpless bystander
during the week-long political fencing, totally dependent on a
few lieutenants acting in their own interests.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : E.U. army takes a definite shape Next : Senate gives Estrada time to answer charges | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|