|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, December 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
A victory for Opposition: Congress
By Javed M. Ansari
NEW DELHI, DEC. 19. Having succeeded in getting its motion
expressing disagreement with the Prime Minister's statement
passed in the Rajya Sabha, the Congress today claimed that the
Opposition had won the battle of wits against the Government on
the Ayodhya issue. ``This is the first time a Prime Minister has
been censured in such a manner, and the credit must go to the
Opposition,'' said the senior Congress leader, Mr. Pranab
Mukherjee.
Congress leaders said the Government had initially refused to
accede to the Opposition demand for a discussion under Rule 184
in the Lok Sabha and Rule 170 in the Rajya Sabha, which entail
voting. However, after a prolonged parliamentary impasse it was
forced to agree to a discussion in both Houses under the
provisions demanded. ``After an eyeball to eyeball confrontation,
it was the Government that blinked,'' said a CWC member.
Talking to reporters after the motion moved by him was passed in
the Rajya Sabha, Mr. Mukherjee drew a parallel between a somewhat
similar motion moved in 1978 against the Morarji Desai government
following differences between the then Prime Minister and his
deputy, Mr. Charan Singh. The demand in 1978 was for a commission
or a parliamentary committee to look into the acts of omission or
commission alleged by Mr. Singh, which the Government had
rejected. ``This time we have succeeded in showing that at least
one House of Parliament disagrees with the Prime Minister's
statement,'' the Congress leader said.
The Opposition was aware that even after its defeat the
Government was not morally bound to quit, ``but we have at least
succeeded in censuring the Prime Minister''. This was the only
constitutional avenue available to the Opposition to register its
disapproval. The Prime Minister's assurance that his party would
abide by the court verdict also did not hold good, Mr. Mukherjee
said. Similar assurances had been given to the Supreme Court in
1992 and yet the Sangh Parivar demolished the mosque. ``The
commitment to the Supreme court was not honoured and one of the
BJP Chief Ministers was jailed for it.''
On the discordant noises on the issue from within the NDA and the
BJP, he said, ``the Prime Minister says we will abide by the
court verdict while one ally asks for Muslims to be defranchised,
while the VHP says the temple will be built at the disputed site
itself.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : We will abide by court verdict: Vajpayee Next : Ceasefire may be extended | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|