|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, January 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Previous
| Next
Hits and misses of the year that was
THE YEAR 2000 was not a good one for the Tamil film industry.
Some 47 days were lost in a tussle between the producers and the
artistes, and film production came to a standstill. Certain
trends were set and certain styles were quietly forgotten.
It was the best year for director Vikraman whose film
``Vaanathaipola'' was the only film which ran for 250 days. The
film is a pure entertainer in which there is no villain. The
director has taken a story and woven the screenplay with
absorbing incidents which can happen in anybody's family.
Vijayakanth who has donned the role of a police officer in a few
other films plays two characters, that of the eldest and the
immediate younger brother.
The story revolves round three younger brothers who on no account
will go against the wishes of the eldest brother. Vijayakanth as
the eldest brother gives a mature performance. But it is the
screenplay and the directorial ability of Vikraman which made the
viewers sit through the film. Prabhu Deva, Livingston, Meena and
a host of other artistes also contributed to the success of the
film.
The second best film was ``Kushi'' which gave a boost to both
Vijay and Jothika. It was directed by Surya. A love story with
good songs, it gave the needed pep to the proceedings.
In ``Sethu'' Vikram and also its director Bala got a great
break.The hero and the heroine got enough frames to prove their
mettle. For Abitha, though it was her debut film it never showed
in any of the scenes in which she had figured. In ``Mudhalvan''
it was director Shankar's touch which made the character of the
Chief Minister played by Raghuvaran and that of the commoner
played by Arjun clash with finesse and made us enjoy it.
``Vallarasu'' was an out and out action oriented film of
Vijayakanth with a twist here and a turn there. For Ajit the high
point was ``Mugavari'' and he has not looked back after it. For
director Ramanarayanan,who has completed 100 films and is still
going strong, it was one more hit with ``Tirupati Ezhumalai
Venkatesa''. ``Parthaen Rasithaen'' and ``Alai Payuthey'' cannot
be put in the same grade but both are love stories which had
enjoyable performances by the lead artistes and deft direction by
the respective directors.
The heroine of the year was Kousalya, who starred in eight films.
Among the heroes Prabhu and Prabhu Deva acted in five films each.
Cameraman turned director Rajeev Menon's ``Kandukondein
Kandukondein'' may have been inspired by ``Sense and
Sensibility'' but the way in which he had projected the story
with enough incidents and proper casting led to the success of
the film. ``Vettrikodi Kattu'' and ``Ezhayin Sirippil'' also
joined the hit list.
But it was in the latter half of the year that bureaucrat turned
director Gnana Rajasekaran came out with a film, which was
thought highly of by every other director who is someone in the
industry. The celluloid version of the Tamil poet's life,
``Bharathi'' was an instant success.The film also got tax
exemption from the Tamil Nadu Government.
The film making trend in the industry is slowly changing. The
technical nuances have vastly improved. This can be seen from
films such as ``Hey Ram'', ``Alai Paayuthey'' and Kandukondein
Kandukondein``. But the storyline and the needed pep have not
been taken care of by the respective directors. In 165 films
released last year, dubbed movies were 96 and the original films
were only 69. This shows that the dubbed movies are gaining
momentum and it is not something over which the industry bigwigs
could be happy about. On any day telling a story with crispness
and cohesion will fetch rewards. But when a director thinks that
he is doing a different thing and tries to play upon sentiments
of the people in a way they do not like, then the film lands in
trouble. This was proved beyond doubt in the case of a majority
of the releases last year.
In Indian movies, comedy plays a vital part and surely the style
of comedy has taken a turn from the duo of Goundamani and Senthil
to rising star Vivek who figured in 19 films. It was a sweeping
change which was eagerly awaited by the people, as the duo's
comedy had become stale. Vivek started off with style trying to
include some message or the other aimed at social reformation and
his attempt succeeded.For music accolades it was Ilaiyaraja in
``Sethu'' and ``Bharathi'', for A. R. Rahman it was
``Mudhalvan'', ``Kandukondien Kandukondien'' and ``Alai
Paayuthey'' and for Deva it was ``Kushi'', ``Ezhaiyin Sirippil''
and many other movies totalling 21. All the three have retained
their respective places in the industry.
The distributors are reluctant to buy films without big names. So
162 Tamil films and 147 dubbed films which had been censored till
last year have not been seen in the cinemas. Six films got `A'
certificate and 19 films received UA. Only two films were shot in
the 35 mm format while 67 films were cinemascope.
Of the 69 Tamil films released only 14 films were hits. One can
only hope things will change for the better in 2001.
S. R. ASHOK KUMAR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Previous : Film Review: Farz Next : Charisma victimised | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|