|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, February 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Jayalalitha moves HC against EVMs
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, FEB. 20. The AIADMK general secretary, Ms. Jayalalitha,
has moved the Madras High Court seeking to prohibit the Chief
Election Commissioner (CEC) from using electronic voting machines
(EVMs) for the coming Assembly elections in Tamil Nadu.
Raising serious doubts about the credibility of the EVMs, the
petition filed on behalf of the party, said the maintenance of
secrecy of voting enshrined in the Representation of the People
Act 1951 should not be infringed upon ``in any circumstances.''
As per the election rules under the R.P. Act., the sealing of the
machines was to be done only by the election officer and not by a
candidate's representative or agent. Even if a voter wanted to
exercise his/her franchise, without `selection any candidate',
he/she had to orally inform the officer in the presence of
others, forgoing one's right to secrecy. In case of an election
dispute, which could go on for 3 to 4 years, preserving the EVMs
with many ``supporting apparatus'' and in an ``unfailing
condition'' was next to impossible, not to speak of the virus
problem.
Ms. Jayalalitha contended that even a U.S. computer expert, had
reportedly told a U.S. court that the electronic ballot system
could be manipulated to ``miscount votes.'' The petition noted
that EVMs' unreliability was revealed in the aftermath of the
recent U.S. Presidential elections.
She said the voters could tamper with or even damage the fragile
voting machines which could lead to repolls. By a letter dated
February 6, 2001 to the CEC, Ms. Jayalalitha said she had sought
some clarifications and raised certain objections and doubts
about the EVMs: whether it was possible for the voter to press
the button more than once casting vote every time. And how would
a voter know that his vote had been registered and accounted for
in favour of his chosen symbol. As EVMs were essentially run by a
``programmed microchip,'' how could one rule out the possibility
of mischief, she posed. Even if a voter pressed the button, it
would not be registered unless the election officer pressed the
control key. Knowingly or unknowingly if the officer failed to
execute his role properly the vote will be disabled. This
effectively put the voter at the ``mercy and discretion'' of the
officer.
Noting that even the Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, and the
Defence Minister, Mr. George Fernandes, were against the use of
EVMs when they were in the Opposition, Ms. Jayalalitha said she
had no objection if the machines were put to use during local
body elections.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : TMC, Cong. unhappy with AIADMK offer Next : Thevar Peravai functionary murder: 3 held | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|