|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, February 21, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Ex-Mayor held guilty of contempt of Lok Ayukta
JABALPUR, FEB. 20. In a pioneering judgment, the Madhya Pradesh
High Court has held the former Bhopal Mayor, Mr. Uma Shankar
Gupta, guilty of contempt of Lok Ayukta for his defamatory
remarks against the body.
The judgment was delivered by a Division Bench, comprising Mr.
Justice C.K. Prasad And Ms. Usha Shukla, in exercise of suo motu
power By the High Court. Mr. Gupta had alleged at a press
conference on October 22, 1999 that in order to influence Lok
Ayukta, Mr. Justice Faizanuddin, the Chief Minister, Mr. Digvijay
Singh, exerted pressure on officials involved in cases under
investigation by the Lok Ayukta, to award a Bhopal Municipal
Corporation (BMC) contract to the Lok Ayukta's son, Mr. M.Z.
Siddiqui, against the wishes of the Mayor-in-Council, which had
revoked the contract.
The judgment assumes further significance in the wake of the
State Cabinet's recent approval of a Bill seeking to give the
same power and authority to the Lok Ayukta and Upalok Ayukta in
matters regarding their contempt, as are enjoyed by the High
Court.
The letter of intent was issued by the BMC Commissioner in
exercise of the State Government's statutory authorisation. The
court observed that Balaji Traders, which was given the tender,
was a consortium of several constituents, one of whom was Mr.
Siddiqui, who had a five per cent stake in the firm in his
capacity as engineer.
Mr. Gupta's statement amounted to contempt of the high office, as
it gave the impression that the Lok Ayukta could be influenced,
the Court said, adding that this tended to affect the credibility
and dignity of the office and people's faith in it. ``What
impression will an individual have when it is sought to be
conveyed that the Lok Ayukta can also be influenced,'' it asked.
The court stated that the contempter had unnecessarily dragged
the name of Lok Ayukta while attacking his political rival.
Though Mr. Gupta had represented before the court that he had
high regard for the Lok Ayukta and not made any insinuation
against it, he had not tendered an apology, the court said.
- UNI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Farooq blames Centre for medical college issue Next : Deficit Budget for M.P. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|