|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 17, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
HC directive sought to enforce CEC order
By Our Staff Reporter
CHENNAI, APRIL 16. A public interest litigation petition seeking
to ``direct the Returning Officers to strictly comply with the
Chief Election Commissioner's 1997 order regarding the
disqualification of a candidate'', has been filed before the
Madras High Court.
The 1997 order states that persons convicted of criminal offence
``even if their appeal is pending with stay'' should not be
permitted to contest elections.
After hearing senior advocate, Mr. K. M. Vijayan, who filed the
petition on behalf of the VOICE (Consumer Care Council), the
First Bench comprising the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice N.K. Jain,
and Mr. Justice K. Sampath, adjourned the matter to April 20.
The petition wanted the court to ``declare that the
disqualification under Section 8 (1) to (3) of the Representation
of People Act cannot be stayed against the object of the Act, and
should be implemented to promote probity in public life and
prevent the criminalisation of politics, irrespective of any
pendency of appeal or suspension of sentence or stay of
conviction under the relevant provisions of the Criminal
Procedure Code (Cr.P.C)''.
The Section makes it clear that neither the pendency of appeal
nor the stay of sentence or conviction can come in the way of
enforcing the provisions enacted in order to preserve probity in
public life, it added.
Citing a Supreme Court observation in 1995 that ``merely because
sentence is suspended or the accused is released on bail, the
conviction does not cease to be operative'', the petition said
since the ``legally untrained mind like that of a Returning
Officer'' could not be expected to understand this legal
position, the court ``should state things in clear terms,
removing the doubts created by the Single Judge of this court''.
The Returning Officer has no jurisdiction to act as a quasi-
judicial authority in deciding the merits of the candidates
disqualified under Section 8, the petition contended.
Placing all these points in the court, the petitioner wanted an
interim injunction restraining the Returning Officers from
accepting ``any nomination from any candidate, who is convicted
and disqualified under any one of the provisions of Section 8 (1)
to 8 (3)'' in the coming Assembly elections in Tamil Nadu.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : DMK betraying NDA, says Vaiko Next : Karunanidhi plays it safe | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|