|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, April 20, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Fishing conservation turns contentious again
By Shakeel M. Rasheed
VISAKHAPATNAM, APRIL 19. The issue of conservation in fishing
operations off the east coast is turning contentious again with
fishermen in the mechanised and deepsea sector divided over the
need for keeping their boats off to help the regeneration of
marine resources in the Bay of Bengal.
Fishermen in the mechanised sector, the main proponents of the
concept of conservation in fishing operations, and trawler
operators had in the past differed over the efficacy of the self-
imposed ban and later on the dates for the lay-off period, but
this time around the bone of contention seems be the `non-
cooperation' of the fishermen in Orissa, West Bengal and Tamil
Nadu in falling in line with the ban.
While fishermen in the mechanised sector at the Visakhapatnam
Fishing Harbour, the operational headquarters of deepsea fishing
in the country, have already declared the lay-off period from
Sunday night to May 31, and the Seafood Exporters Association of
India (AP region), too, seemingly agreeing to keep their vessels
off fishing (though not formally announced by it), the mini-
trawlers represented by Deepsea Trawler Owners' Welfare
Association, have struck a defiant stand.
``It does not make sense, we on Andhra coast observe the monsoon
trawl ban but fishermen in Orissa, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu
flout it. We have common fishing grounds,'' Dr. Y.G.K. Murthy,
president of DTOWA which represents about 40 mini trawlers, told
TheHindu on Tuesday.
He claimed that his association was ready to observe the lay-off
period if fishermen in all the maritime States uniformly observed
the common conservation period, and as it was not happening now,
the mini- trawler operators had decided to take their vessels out
to the sea once their maintenance works were over in about 10
days. ``We have conveyed our decision to the Fisheries Department
and the various bodies representing the fishing operators,'' he
said.
Fishermen in Orissa, according to him, had sought exemption from
the ban last year on the plea that they needed to recover from
the super cyclone impact ``but there is no apparent sign of them
joining us now''. Dr. Murthy said his association was also
opposed to the idea of exempting the `daily fishing' during the
conservation period. ``We have written to the Government that a
uniform conservation period off the East Coast could be observed
by taking the help of the Coast Guard,'' he added.
Traditional fishermen in the mechanised sector, represented by
the AP Mechanised Fishing Boat Operators Association (APMFBOA)
and Visakha Dolphin Boat Operators Welfare Association, had sent
a delegation to Orissa recently for enlisting the support of
their Oriya counterparts in enforcing the conservation period.
``The Fisheries Department officials in Orissa and the local
associations representing the fishermen have promised to observe
the lay- off this season. Though they seem to have a problem of
enforcing the ban given the fact the boats in that State operate
from various points on the coast, they have assured us of fullest
cooperation,'' Mr. P. Maheswara Rao, general secretary of
APMFBOA, said.
The conservation period was being observed by over 3,000
mechanised boats operating from Visakhapatnam, Kakinada,
Machilipatnam, Nizampatnam and Krishnapatnam on Andhra coast.
Fishermen in the mechanised sector in AP have for long been
seeking a uniform monsoon trawl ban by all coastal States through
enactment of laws for allowing completion of the breeding cycle
of prawns, the species that sustains the fishing industry. They
vouch for the results of the conservation practice in terms of
improved catches.
The APMFBOA has pointed out in its various representations to the
Government that even if one coastal State enacts the ban,
fishermen in other States could venture out to fishing defeating
its objective of conservation of resources.
According to the association, uniform effort in conserving the
marine resources could be possible only if the ban is enacted by
Parliament, which has been recommended by the Majumdar Committee.
The Ministry of Agriculture has also advised all coastal States
to make such laws.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Four policemen killed in landmine blast Next : Rs. 50 lakhs each sanctioned for 13 segments | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|