|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, April 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Labour up against voter fatigue
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, APRIL 25. Barely six weeks before an expected general
election, widespread voter fatigue threatens to take some of the
sheen off a Labour victory. An opinion poll today confirmed fears
of a low turnout with only 50 per cent of the public saying they
were certain to vote, compared with 66 per cent who made a
similar promise on the eve of 1997 elections.
While Labour retains its unbeatable lead over the Tories, a low
turnout is likely to hurt its prospects in marginal seats which
it snatched from the Tories in the last election on the strength
of floating voters and an all-pervasive national determination to
get the Tories off their back. The 1997 elections saw a huge
turnout of over 71 per cent as people voted with their feet to
put Mr. Tony Blair in Downing Street. The motivation this time is
less evident, partly no doubt because of growing dissatisfaction
with his Government's record on several issues but essentially
because a Labour victory is taken for granted and therefore many
think that their vote wouldn't really make a difference.
Fear of low voting has consistently haunted Labour and today's
poll in The Times is likely to intensify the debate in the party
on motivating its supporters to get out of their homes on June 7,
the most likely polling date. Already, Mr. Blair has called for a
more ``sparkling'' election manifesto to impress the undecided
voters, though the more conservative opinion in the party is
believed to be against trying to ``pull rabbits out of a hat'' in
its anxiety to please everyone. Mr. Blair, however, is taking no
chances and his Government's announcement today of an ambitious
£1 billion scheme to target poor families with children was
widely seen as a pre-election giveaway.
Under the scheme, described as a ``big idea'' not tried in Europe
before, the Government would put in up to £500 in a trust
fund for each child at birth - and by the time the child is
eligible to claim it at the age of 18, his or her starting
personal ``wealth'' would be worth between £5,000 and
£7,000. They can use this for further education or to buy
their first home or to start a family. The idea, according to the
Chancellor, Mr. Gordon Brown, is to tackle child poverty and give
children from deprived families a fighting chance to start in
life. The Tories were quick to dub it an election ``gimmick,''
saying the Government was doing no more than returning to the
people some of the money it had taken from them in ``stealth''
taxes.
More ``family friendly'' incentives are likely in the coming days
and these, together with the benefits of Mr. Brown's please-all
budget, are expected to go some way to win back for the Labour
the confidence of such of its supporters who had begun to get
disillusioned. The Times' poll, however, suggests that to a great
extent Labour would owe its victory to the absence of a credible
alternative. ``The lack of enthusiasm for the Government suggests
that Labour's continued high rating reflects the Tories' lack of
credibility as an alternative,'' the newspaper said pointing out
that the Tory leader, Mr. William Hague's personal ratings
continued to be ``heavily negative with the dissatisfied
outnumbering the satisfied by more than two to one, with no sign
of improvement.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Estrada complains about jail conditions Next : British police force opening up | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|