|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, May 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Kalahandi's agony
Sir, - The plight of the poor in Kalahandi, ever struggling even
to get the basic necessities like water and food, is well
portrayed in the article by Ms. Nirmala Lakshman (Magazine
section, May 13).
As the writer has pointed out, several others have written at
length about the appalling condition of the under-privileged and
under-nourished people in Kalahandi. But it is a pity that
neither the State nor the Centre has taken adequate steps to put
an end to the agony of the Kalahandi inhabitants so far. Sad to
learn that the tireless efforts of Mr. Thakurdas Mahanand, a
village leader, to organise digging of an old well to augment
water supply have not met with success.
What does the State Government have to say about this? Is it not
heart-rending to hear that even 54 years after Independence, the
people of Kalahandi and its suburbs have to run from pillar to
post to get potable water? One hopes that the Prime Minister,
Mr.A.B. Vajpayee, would pay a visit to Kalahandi at the earliest
and ensure that at least the people get protected water supply.
Mani Natarajan,
Chennai
Governor and statute
Date: 18-05-2001 :: Pg: 12 :: Col: a
Sir, - I congratulate you on the forthright manner in which you
have, in your Editorial (May 15) disapproved of the haste with
which Ms. Jayalilatha has assumed office as Chief Minister,
though I find it difficult to endorse your defence of the
Governor's action. For anyone to suggest that the Constitution
does not specifically bar a person convicted of corruption
charges from being sworn in as Chief Minister would be to insult
the Constitution makers.
You have referred to the ``possibility that refusing to swear her
in could precipitate an ugly and unwanted constitutional
crisis.'' A Governor is on oath to uphold the Constitution which
has to be done both in letter and spirit. If, in doing so, any
difficult situation develops, the Governor has to deal with it. A
Governor, for instance, should not be deterred by a possible law
and order situation but uphold the rule of law under all
circumstances. What the Governor has now done would perhaps imply
that the law of the land would not apply to a politician who is
able to obtain popular mandate to hold public office. Certainly a
wrong precedent has been set. You have very appropriately
referred to the ``absurdities of the present situation'' namely,
the existence of a number of corruption cases against Ms.
Jayalilatha, many of which are overseen by officials of the State
Government which she now heads and you have advised that Ms.
Jayalilatha should resist the temptation to influence the legal
process. It is doubtful if she would heed the advice.
V. Krishnamachari,
* * *
Sir, - While all of us talk about transparency in functioning of
Governments and other undertakings, why not the Governor of Tamil
Nadu explain to the public how she went about this exercise of
installing Ms. Jayalalitha as Chief Minister and her consultation
with constitutional experts, etc. This is all the more needed
when strong views by many prominent citizens for and against are
being expressed.
S. Chandrasekaran,
Chennai
* * *
Sir, - Legal brains and public moralists cry hoarse against the
Tamil Nadu Governor's decision to invite Ms. Jayalalitha to take
the oath of office as Chief Minister. The eminent jurist, Mr.
V.R. Krishna Iyer, while allowing the then Prime Minister, Indira
Gandhi, to continue in office without exercising the right to
vote in Parliament during the pendancy of a case, opened his
judgment with this famous observation, ``Life is larger than
Law.''
The Tamil Nadu Governor did the right thing; if she had refused,
she would have committed the blunder of negating the mandate of
the people. Mr. George Fernandes, who is faulting the Governor
for creating a bad precedent, should remember that he was
inducted into the Janata Government headed by Morarji Desai after
the Government withdrew the chargesheet against him in the Baroda
Dynamite case. All those who talk about bad precedents now should
look back on the past events before blaming others.
P.C.Ganesan,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Political parties & people's power Next : DMK's downfall | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|