|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, May 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Political parties & people's power
By Surendra Mohan
SEVERAL FACTORS have worked together to erode the confidence of
the people in our political parties, though they still cherish
the democratic polity in the country. That three successive
ruling formations, as single parties or as fronts, pursued the
same policies in the economic sphere, with greater or lesser
speed, in the whole preceding decade certainly made the people
wonder how they can be distinguished from one another. This issue
becomes even more relevant as some parties oppose these policies
when in the Opposition and implement them when in power. Yet
another cause for the people's disillusionment with political
parties is the corruption at all levels in the administration.
Then, there are the usual complaints of the failure of
Governments to get the Lokpal Bill enacted for over three
decades.
At the same time, the political process has deteriorated in
several respects. Elections have become inordinately expensive.
Political opportunism of desertion of parties for greener
pastures and frequent changes in the composition of alliances is
now a settled practice. Grassroots democracy is becoming scarcer
in a large number of parties; nomination of office-bearers at
lower levels from above appears to have become the rule. There
certainly are exceptions, particularly the Left parties; yet,
even they have to make serious compromises. On the other hand,
mass agitations by political parties have become fewer though the
people's grievances have increased enormously. Wherever such
agitations are launched, they perform to a set routine, and are,
therefore, considered ineffective by the suffering masses.
Under the circumstances, local-level activist groups have started
coming to the fore. Groups which have been able to mobilise the
people in their areas are action-oriented outfits which have no
party affiliations, but in which persons from Gandhian, socialist
and marxist streams are to be found in large numbers. Talking
with them, it becomes obvious that their disillusionment with
their respective parties and groups led them to this non-party
activism. Gradually, however, these groups have realised the need
to band together to achieve results. The leaders of the activist
groups among farmers, even large organisations such as the
Bharatiya Kisan Union, understood this much earlier and built up
strong agitations. The groups which have been concerned with the
displacements of tribal communities by big industrial or
irrigation-cum-power projects also work together.
During the last few years, activist groups from different fields
and working with different communities have created some federal
structures. The most well-known is the National Alliance of
People's Movements (NAPM) which has brought together the Narmada
Bachao Andolan, the Fishermen's Federation, the Chhatisgarh Mukti
Morcha, the Sarva Sewa Sangh, the Adivai Mukti Sangathan and the
like.
The Mazdoor Kisan Sangharsh Samiti in Rajasthan has fought for
the people's right for information for the last five years, and
under the effective leadership of a former IAS officer, Ms. Aruna
Roy, succeeded in pressuring the State Government to grant that
right. However, the MKSS found that getting the right meant much
more than mere passage of the Act, and that its implementation
required a determined struggle on the ground. The effectiveness
of its campaign even made the Chief Ministers of Rajasthan and
Madhya Pradesh visit the MKSS conference in April.
The campaign on the Sardar Sarovar and Narmada Sagar dams has
already achieved international publicity, although it has only
brought out the utter insensitivity of the authorities and the
highest judiciary to the plight of thousands of families who have
been, and are going to be displaced because of it. The
indefatigable Ms. Medha Patkar, now joined by Ms. Arundhati Roy,
has continued the battle. With them has been Baba Amte, that
doyen of the Gandhian constructive workers of modern India, who
has been living on the banks of the Narmada in a village which
would be one of the first to be submerged. The protest against
the Tehri dam, being constructed in a seismic zone, also goes on,
and recently saw Mr. Sundarlal Bahuguna go on a fast. The NAPM
has been no less active in championing the rights of fishermen.
The struggle for the restoration of civil liberties and human
rights brought together several legal luminaries and activist
groups, particularly since 1976 when the fight was joined by them
to challenge the suspension of fundamental rights during the
Emergency in 1975-77. The People's Union for Civil Liberties and
the People's Union for Democratic Rights have been active since
1980, and some other organisations have also sprung up. The most
prominent in this field have been Mr. V. M. Tarkunde, who was
joined by the late Gobind Mukhoti, Mr. Rajindar Sachar, Mr. A. B.
Kannabiran and Mr. Tapan Bose.
Ms. Mahashweta Devi, the eminent Oriya novelist, has concerned
herself with the liberation and rehabilitation of the former
criminal tribes. Mr. V. R. Krishna Iyer, along with Swami
Agnivesh, has taken up the cause of bonded labour and child
labour.Lately, the displacement of hutment dwellers in
metropolitan cities has galvanised several political leaders and
social activists, and the former Prime Minister, Mr. V. P. Singh,
has espoused this issue. However, activist groups such as Sanjha
Morcha, a non-party formation, have been active in Delhi for
long. More recently, the tribal communities have become the
targets of the repression in several States, as the new policy is
to turn over the forests to the corporate sector.
Police firings in Dewas district of Madhya Pradesh and Koil Karo
region in Jharkhand have underlined the basic approach of the
powers that be. Madhya Pradesh is ruled by the Congress(I) and
Jharkhand by the NDA coalition. In the first case, the tribals
were accused of stealing wood from forests and in the second
case, they were punished for opposing the construction of the
dam. The mid-term plan appraisal, 2000, has remarked that during
the last 50 years, 25 million people, of whom 40 per cent were
tribals, were uprooted for public projects. Although a law of
1996 gave substantial powers of development to the district
panchayats in the Scheduled areas and the Supreme Court
prohibited mining and other industrial activities, excepting by
cooperatives of the tribals themselves in these areas, the
exploitation of the tribals has only increased. For, the forests
are now considered a commercial resource to be exploited.
Hence, the emerging discontent among the tribals and other forest
dwelling communities has thrown up new activist groups. Women are
always at the receiving end in social violence. Women's groups
are therefore raising their voices in defence of their rights.
Political parties from the BJP to the Congress(I) have kept
themselves aloof from the activist groups. These groups also do
not trust them. Their apprehension has been that different
parties would exploit them for partisan gains, might divide them
or swallow them up. The parties sometimes would not agree with
the approaches adopted by these groups which are considered
exclusivist, or mistrust their sources of funding. Nor would a
party trust a group which does not put all its eggs in its
basket. The association of some of the activist groups with
foreign funding organisations also creates impediments. Moreover,
most parties have their mass organisations, which sometimes
compete with the activist groups. The latter also react
negatively to the performances of the parties whenever they are
in power and also the manner in which they make compromises with
vested interests.
Under increasing popular pressure, however, prejudices on both
sides are being reviewed. In several conferences of the farmers,
political parties and activist groups shared a platform. The
consequences of various policies related to globalisation have
created common bonds among them to jointly mobilise the people
for resistance. They should meet regularly. Together, they can
discuss positive steps for the future.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Dangerous precedent Next : Kalahandi's agony | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
State Elections |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|