|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, May 27, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Does this sound familiar?
Doctors - having been given the gift of being able to help people
in distress - should remember the oath they took before they
began their careers, says DR. SARANYA NARAYAN.
RECENTLY a friend's (I will call her Deepa) mother had an
appointment with a doctor and she decided to accompany her. They
went to the hospital, after having confirmed the time, in the
afternoon. They were caught up in a traffic jam on the way, but
reached the hospital with five minutes to spare. They went in,
met the receptionist, and then sat down on some grimy looking
chairs. Deepa noticed that the walls needed a coat of paint, and
that with so many patients around them coughing and sneezing, her
mother's existing problems could get worse. After half an hour,
Deepa got up and asked the nurse if she had informed the doctor
that they were there. The nurse told them, nonchalantly, that
though appointments were given from 7 p.m., the doctor usually
turned up at around 9 p.m. as he visited a number of hospitals.
Deepa had not told anyone that she was a doctor too, and they
decided, that as there was nothing urgent to rush home for, they
could wait for a while more. At around 8-30 p.m., both of them
had begun feeling hungry and decided that enough was enough and
that it was time to get home.
Hearing about this recently, it cast my mind back to another
instance almost 14 years ago, when my parents had gone to an
orthopaedic surgeon. My mother was the patient. Her cervical
spondylosis was so bad that she was unable to lift her arm.
However the doctor was unaffected by her plight and told her that
as she was a retired person, there was no need to write, read, or
for that matter, do anything seriously. Now that she had the
time, having "discharged all her duties", she could just read
spiritual texts to pass time. I was in the United Kingdom then
and looked forward to her letters. When I heard what had
happened, I was indignant. All around me I saw healthy people, in
their eighties and nineties, who had hip replacements, generally
enjoying life. Why was it in our country alone that we still held
old fashioned views on the elderly? Why is it that we dismiss
anyone over the age of 60 as being "useless"? I honestly cannot
blame my mother for wanting to avoid visits to doctors if she can
help it. Most people her age feel justifiably, but wrongly, that
they are no longer useful.
These days such experiences are so common that one feels ashamed
to belong to this once "noble profession" Very often the medical
profession seems to exhibit callousness for patients' feelings
and time. However in defence of those good doctors in our midst -
there are still many - I must also write about a person whom I
feel is quite exceptional. Most of our professors practised
medicine the way it really ought to be done, and this we expected
and accepted. This is however about a young person who is so
conscientious that she follows up her patients' cases even after
they are cured of their illnesses. She once said something which
made a lot of sense to me. "If a patient walks in to see me, he
or she has a problem of sufficient importance to them which they
feel I may be able to help with. Otherwise why should they go to
such trouble."
Patients with access to the internet have become an enlightened
lot. This is to such an extent that they go to not one but a
handful of specialists. Such perseverance. The end result is that
no two doctors can and will have similar views on either the
diagnosis or treatment, and the patient is back to where he or
she started. Finally those lucky few that have a consensus on the
diagnosis, arrive at the laboratory triumphant with their early
success in the first half of the battle at least. They come with
this battery of tests with acronyms that make them feel that the
doctor they consulted was a very learned person indeed.
The following morning - after a good breakfast, that will get
them through the day as they do not know how long this visit will
take - they arrive at the laboratory of their own choice or one
suggested by a friend. Suggestions made by the consultant are
usually on several criteria that I do not want to dwell upon
right now.
When they arrive they find a queue. While some wait, as they see
that the lab is doing its best, not all patients are good-natured
and instead want to get preferential treatment. Some see that a
system is in operation and try and reason on the labs' behalf.
When it is their turn, they find that they are asked questions
(that they think are not required) about their diet and
medication on that particular day.
Let us take this example - here was this large individual who was
used to throwing his weight around. Now he was asked by this
midget of a customer support officer the following questions:
"May I have your name, sir?" He was rude in his answer. She then
asked if he could spell it or write it out on the requisition
form that she gave him. He now looked at her like she was an
imbecile but anyway humoured her. She then asked him his age, his
initials and, before he could get angry, explained to him that it
was a precaution taken, just to avoid confusion in the event of
two people with the same name being present in the lab at the
same time. She then asked him if he had eaten or had a cup of tea
or coffee that morning. By this time he had lost patience with
her. He told her to get on with the job, the doctor had just
asked him to get the tests done, he knew all the instructions he
needed to follow and that he was familiar with the pattern as he
had been tested several times earlier. She processed his request
and after a few minutes more this "gentleman" was called in for
testing.
By this time he remembered that he had had a glass of fruit juice
before coming to the lab. He dismissed this, as she had not
specifically asked him this and decided to forget about it. When
his name was called, just as the technical staff were getting
ready to draw a blood sample from him, the young man in the lab
asked him once more about what he had had to eat.
He decided he confess about the juice and so proffered this bit
of information.
The technician immediately said that for the required tests the
person had to have "starved" and requested him very politely to
come the next day. Our friend was almost about to explode and
decided to have one last try.
"So what, you do the tests and then just give allowance for the
juice I drank. Can't a lab this big do that?" This most certainly
cannot and should not be done. When the technical supervisor and
other staff refused to back down, the patient insisted on meeting
the doctor in-charge. When the doctor explained the same thing
again to this patient, highlighting the fact that it was being
done in his own interest, he was appeased. The last straw however
was his parting shot. "Your staff should have told me all this
initially." Talk of attitudes.
It is not always as bad though, and there are several patients
who come with no expectations apart from being treated
courteously and efficiently, are happy with the service and do
compliment the lab personnel. This makes up, for all that those
in the line of fire have to face quite often and gives them the
impetus to meet the next patient with the same amount of, if not
more, commitment as before.
The points I want to make is that there are good doctors and bad
ones, good laboratories and bad ones too, but do not forget that
there are some grouches as well as gracious patients too. I do
feel strongly that we - as part of the noblest of all
professions, who have been given the gift of being able to help
people in distress - should remember the oath we all took when we
started out as young idealistic doctors.
We need to spend more time with patients (not have group sessions
to save time) and treat each patient as our own kith and kin
(thankfully we still care for them, and have a rich culture and
tradition to answer to). We need to drop the callous attitudes
that have slowly infiltrated into the practice of medicine and
not arbitrarily dismiss anyone as being a hypochondriac or old
and therefore not important enough. The rot that has set in needs
to be stopped and fast at that.
There will come a time not too far away, when we too will need
help. Let us never forget that.
The writer is Director, Lister Laboratory and Research Centre,
Nungambakkam, Chennai.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Workplace ethics Next : The 'A' to 'Z' of women's needs? | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|