|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, June 18, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
ICC's views on Condon report today
By Ted Corbett
LEEDS, JUNE 17. Allegations that Alec Stewart, the England one-
day captain, was dragging his feet about fixing an interview with
Lord Condon, head of the Anti Corruption Unit, died today as it
became clear that the two sides would meet after the end of the
triangular tournament next week-end.
The still unresolved accusations against Stewart are that during
the 1992-3 tour of India he accepted 5,000 pounds sterling from
the bookmaker Mukesh Gupta for information about pitches and
weather forecasts. He says he did not know Gupta and Gupta's
statement lacks support which is why the England and Wales
Cricket Board have allowed him to play on for England and
appointed him captain of the limited overs team.
A statement from Stewart's lawyers brought the latest episode in
the match-fixing saga to an abrupt halt but it is still not clear
who is at fault. It has all the hallmarks of a squabble between
little children and one wonders why it was necessary for Lord
Condon to bring it out into the open. He claimed in today's
papers that Stewart had evaded attempts to set up a meeting and
for a couple of hours the radio bulletins followed the Sunday
newspaper headlines with interviews and chat and so much deep
insight that one might have thought the end of the world was
nigh.
By mid-day Stewart's solicitors had said ``that from the start
Alec Stewart has made it totally clear that he will fully co-
operate with any inquiry'' and that ``Alec answered all the
questions put to him by Lord MacLaurin, chairman of the England
and Wales Cricket Board.''
They went on to say that he spoke to Lord Condon in January and
that they agreed to meet later. The solicitors went on to claim
that it took Lord Condon five months - after a reminder in May -
to produce the evidence which Stewart had asked to see as all he
knew was what had been reported in the press.
``Last week Lord Condon responded by sending what appears to be a
copy of a document detailing comments allegedly made by Mukesh
Gupta about a range of individuals. It adds nothing to the
allegations made against Alec which have already been published.
As we understand the position this remains the only so-called
evidence that exists after months of enquiries,'' his lawyers'
statement says.
A precise date for the meeting will be made tomorrow. Stewart has
a week free after the one-day tournament before the first Test
against Australia which begins at Edgbaston on July 5.
Tomorrow the International Cricket Council gives its views on the
Condon report but in essence there has been little progress on
match-fixing since Hansie Cronje, the South African captain,
resigned so dramatically 14 months ago; despite the King inquiry
in South Africa, the Condon inquiry and the research by the CBI
in India.
Condon says that the practice continues so his investigations
have failed to deter anyone. His preliminary report published a
month ago contained a great deal of carefully prepared evidence
but no names and was hailed in England as yet further proof that
the crime was contained within the sub- continent.
Let's hope that ICC suggests a way forward tomorrow and that
their meeting in London which began today comes up with a
wholehearted determination to chase down those involved in match-
fixing. If they don't we will only be able to conclude that the
ICC habit of inaction is still in place as firmly as the
bookmakers' belief that cricket can be bought and sold.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Waqar breathes fire Next : ECB chief repeats threat | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|