![]() Wednesday, Aug 27, 2003 |
| National | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Legal Correspondent
A Bench, comprising Justice Brijesh Kumar and Justice Arun Kumar, reserved the decision on the appeal after hearing Mr. Advani's counsel, Harish Salve, and Dinesh Diwedi, counsel for the Bihar Government. Mr. Diwedi contended that the Government was considering the report of the three-member Commission inquiring into the 1989 Bhagalpur riots and no action had been taken against either the BJP or its then chief, Mr. Advani. If the Government had proposed any action then a cause of action could have arisen, he said. Mr. Salve justified the High Court judgment and said a person's reputation was intrinsically related to his fundamental right to life and liberty and the same right was breached when the Commission, without giving Mr. Advani an opportunity to defend himself, criticised him on the basis of his articles in the party magazine "Panchjanya" four years after the occurrence of the riots. He drew the court's attention to the objectionable passages alleging that Mr. Advani was responsible for preaching communalism in the country.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|