![]() Wednesday, Sep 03, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, This refers to "Consensus on retaining Article 356 with safeguards" (Aug. 29). It is true that the Article has been misused often. But then which law of the land has not been misused by politicians for self-aggrandisement? And what is the guarantee that the amended Article will not be misused?
N.R. Ramachandran,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|