![]() Sunday, Sep 21, 2003 |
| Southern States | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Tamil Nadu-Chennai
By K.T. Sangameswaran
The panel was stirred into action by views expressed by the principals at a consultation meeting here a week ago on ways to eliminate corporal punishment. In the notices to the Secretary, Information and Broadcasting and the Chairman, CBFC, and its regional offices in Chennai and Hyderabad, the Commission member, S. Sambandham, said the principals were anguished at the way youth were portrayed in the film. The dialogues were full of double entendres. The younger generation and women were depicted in bad taste. The letter said the film had been censored in Hyderabad and it was not known whether CBFC members were conversant with Tamil, particularly the colloquial version. The film "hurt viewer sensibilities. Mr. Sambandham said violation of Section 2 (d) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, would attract punishment. (As per the provision, "human rights" means the rights to life, liberty, equality and dignity of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution or embodied in International Covenants and enforceable by courts in India). He cautioned the authorities that even negligence by a public servant in preventing the violation of human rights fell within the purview of Section 12 (functions of the Commission).
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|