![]() Wednesday, Nov 12, 2003 |
| National | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | National
By Our Staff Reporter
While sentencing Mr. Akbar, Kaushik Mitter, Editor, T. Venkatesh, printer and publisher, and Venkatesh Kesri, reporter, the Bench said: "We hope that such a situation, where the court is required to perform the painful duty of invoking its contempt jurisdiction against the press, will not arise again". The four were sentenced for carrying an item titled "Plea in court to name judge as fraud accused" in its New Delhi edition on May 5, 2003. The Bench found that the report, which was based on an application filed by an advocate in a Metropolitan Magistrate Court in the Patiala House courts, was published without checking the facts. The Bench said the advocate's application had been heard by the court concerned and thereafter by a Sessions Court and dismissed. It was neither brought before the High Court or the Supreme Court. Yet the report gave the impression that it was pending in the court. The Bench found the four guilty of scandalising the High Court and one of its judges.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|