![]() Thursday, Nov 13, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The verdict in the Safdar Hashmi murder case came early this month, 14 years after he was killed. Similarly, the Naina Sahni murder case, involving the former Youth Congress president, Sushil Sharma, came to judgment eight years after she was murdered. Now, the deeply disturbing question is, can a criminal justice system under which murder cases can take up to 14 years or more to be decided (the accused can still drag things by appealing to the higher judiciary), be really effective? C. Antony Louis, Mumbai
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|