![]() Thursday, Nov 20, 2003 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
By P. S. Suryanarayana
The warning, seen as one of the most serious admonitions in recent times, has come in the context of some moves by Mr. Chen to set time-lines for the drafting of a new `constitution' by December 10, 2006, and for the promulgation of such an independence-oriented statute by May 20, 2008. Taiwan is home to the `nationalists' and their descendants, with the `nationalists' having lost to the Communist Party of China that founded the People's Republic of China (PRC) over half a century ago. Beijing continues to regard Taiwan as part of the PRC, a position that the international community, inclusive of the U.S., has recognised by acknowledging the validity of Beijing's One-China principle. Mr. Wang prefaced his warning with the comment that Beijing would still like to re-unify Taiwan with the mainland through peaceful means in the interests of the people on that island, who were but Chinese compatriots. Describing any move by Mr. Chen to rely on the U.S. for gaining independence as "a very naive and extremely dangerous idea'', Mr. Wang said: "The Americans will protect their own national interests [and] are expected to neither protect Taiwan independence nor shed blood for Taiwan independence''. According to Sheng Lijun, an expert on the China-Taiwan issue, Beijing hopes that China's `momentous' rise as a power would "not only change the balance of power across the (Taiwan) Strait'' but also weaken the U.S. `commitment' to Taiwan.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|