![]() Thursday, Nov 27, 2003 |
| Business | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Business
By Our Special Correspondent
Though the TRAI has officially listed a number of reasons, the cellular industry gave the most potent. It said since the cellular and basic licences had been unified and the same terms and condition applied to both, there should not be any discrimination in charging IUC from the two sectors. The IUC regime has kept the TRAI in convulsions ever since the concept was first aired and various TRAI regimes have had to go back and revise the IUC announced by them. While announcing the IUC, the TRAI invariably said a great deal of thought had gone into the exercise. But that was never the case whenever the IUC regulations were scrutinised closely. For the record, the TRAI said implementation was being delayed because some phone service providers have sought clarification on a number of issues relating to IUC applicable for unified access services; numbering, routing, point of interconnections; carriage charges; reconciliation issues; negotiation in carriage charges beyond 50 km; calls between cellular companies where direct connectivity has not yet been implemented and implementation details from Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|