![]() Friday, Nov 28, 2003 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
By Hasan Suroor
The move, which shocked even the hard-line anti-immigrant groups, provoked condemnation from rights activists who said it amounted to holding children to `ransom' and might not stand scrutiny under the European Convention on Human Rights. "This is unreasonable, inhumane and a breach of fundamental rights," a spokesperson for Save the Children said The Labour MPs also criticised the plan with the former Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, denouncing it as `authoritarian' and a "step too far for any decent Government." He accused the Government of going "heavy on social authoritarianism" instead of promoting "a pluralist, multicultural society." In Parliament, even the asylum-bashing Tories called the move `despicable' and vowed to oppose it. "The Prime Minister and the Home Secretary should be ashamed. We shall oppose any legislative provision that seeks to give effect to this despicable provision," said the new Tory leader, Michael Howard, whose own parents came to Britain as immigrants. But the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, whose tough stance on asylum has annoyed his own party MPs, defended the proposal saying it would be used only as a "last resort" to enforce immigration laws which require failed asylum seekers to leave the country.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|