![]() Monday, Dec 01, 2003 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | International
By Vaiju Naravane
The judge took just 30 seconds to read the verdict of not guilty. The three photographers, Jacques Langevin, Christian Martinez and Eric Chassery had chased the car carrying the Princess and her lover from the Ritz Hotel in Paris and into an underpass where it crashed at a speed of 160 kmph. The Princess, Dodi and the driver died. Diana's bodyguard was severely injured. The case was filed by Dodi Al Fayad's father, the millionaire hotelier, Mohammed Al Fayed, and centred around photographs taken on August 31, 1997, the night of the accident. He filed a civil suit under France's strict privacy laws after an official investigation charging eight photographers for failing to assist persons in danger was dropped. Mr. Al Fayad reportedly believes that his son and Princess Diana were assassinated by British secret services to prevent the Princess from marrying a Muslim and having children by him. Recently, the Princess's former butler, Paul Burrell, published letters from the Princess in which she said she feared for her life. The judge in Paris said the photographers had not violated privacy laws because the nature of Diana's relationship with Dodi was known to the public and because they had photographed them openly. Mr. Al Fayed said he plans to appeal the verdict.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|