![]() Saturday, Dec 13, 2003 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The Malimath Committee's recommendations pertaining to reforms in criminal law are strange. Sir James Fitzmann Stephen, who drafted the Evidence Act, was a visionary who laid down that confessions to police are not admissible in a court of law. But the Committee recommends that such evidence be made admissible. The presumption of innocence is also enshrined in the Act. But the Committee has recommended that the standard of "proof beyond reasonable doubt" be done away with. Surely, there are other areas where reforms are required.
S.S. Venkata Subramanian,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2003, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|