![]() Wednesday, Mar 31, 2004 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The article, "IIMs, fees and freedom of management" (March 29), succinctly dealt with the controversy. On why the Government is bent on reducing the fees, the reasons could be external pressure from the Sangh Parivar, which takes pride in saffronising education. Or the autonomous nature of the IIMs might have made the Government want to `rein' them in.
Prabeer Sikdar,
* * * Sir, Instead, the Government could have spent the energy and time on setting up more such institutes or on eradicating illiteracy on a priority basis.
K.S. Gopalakrishnan,
* * * Sir, If the Government is so concerned about higher education, why does it not provide funds to so many languishing colleges and universities, especially in States such as Bihar, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh where students have to make do with sub-standard facilities? The IIMs, which are self-sufficient, do not need the funds, while these universities do.
Meha Kiran,
* * * Sir, The motive appears to be to gain backdoor entry for undeserving candidates with political connections.
V. Sujalini,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|