![]() Thursday, Sep 30, 2004 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, This is in response to the editorial "Détente as an imperative" (Sept. 28). The fact that terrorism did not figure in the joint declaration is a cause for major concern. Also, India's nuclear weapons are not Pakistan-centric. The suggestion to de-induct our nuclear weapons is short-sighted.
Prasant G. Nair,
V. Srinivasan,
Sir, In your editorial, you have advocated a process of normalisation of ties with Pakistan by maintaining status quo in Jammu and Kashmir. This is possible with regard to China, since both India and China have been able to maintain peace and stability in the border areas over long periods. But while India is prepared to maintain status quo in Kashmir, Pakistan has been aiding and abetting terror in the State for decades.
S. Venugopalan,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|