![]() Friday, Dec 03, 2004 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
Sir, The report that a 16-member panel appointed by the United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, has recommended an expansion of the Security Council in a manner that does not give veto power to the new permanent members is unfair to nations such as India, Japan, Germany and Brazil ("U.N. panel not for change in veto power," Dec. 2). If the new members are denied the veto power, the restructuring of the Council will be merely cosmetic.
Nalini Vijayaraghavan,
Sir, The best way to reform the U.N. is to take away the veto power from all the permanent members. All decisions must be taken by a simple or two-thirds majority.
K.L. Batra,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|