![]() Tuesday, Dec 21, 2004 |
| International | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | International
By Dan Glaister
LOS ANGELES, DEC. 20. The pressure on the beleaguered U.S. Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, intensified yesterday and threatened to taint his main supporter, the President, George W. Bush. David Hackworth, a retired U.S. army colonel-turned-writer, reported that Mr. Rumsfeld had used a mechanical signature writer to sign his name on letters of condolence to relatives of soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Though the charge was initially denied by the Pentagon, Mr. Rumsfeld issued a statement on Thursday acknowledging the practice and promising to halt it. ``While I have not individually signed each one, in the interest of ensuring expeditious contact with grieving family members, I have directed that in the future I sign each letter,'' Mr. Rumsfeld said in the statement. Mr. Hackworth also reported allegations by relatives of deceased soldiers that letters they had received from the President had been signed by a machine. Ted Smith, whose son Eric was one of the first 100 U.S. soldiers to die in Iraq, told Mr. Hackworth that the letter he received ``from the Commander-in-Chief was signed with a thick, green marking pen. I thought it was stamped then and do even now. He had time for golf and the ranch but not enough to sign a decent signature with a pen for his beloved hero soldiers.'' Rejecting the charges, the White House spokesman, Allen Abney, told the armed forces newspaper Stars and Stripes that the President did personally sign all condolence letters.
Uncomfortable fortnight
But the revelations about Mr. Rumsfeld cap an uncomfortable fortnight for the Defence Secretary. One of the few members of the Bush Cabinet to avoid being reshuffled after the election, he has come under attack from within the Republican Party. Mr. Rumsfeld also came under attack from the veteran Republican and former Senate majority leader, Trent Lott, last week, who declared that he was ``not a fan'' of the Secretary of Defence. And William Kristol, the editor of the conservative Weekly Standard and one of the biggest supporters of the neo-conservative foreign policy followed by the Bush White House, questioned whether Mr. Rumsfeld was the right man for the job. © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|