![]() Monday, Mar 21, 2005 |
| New Delhi | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | New Delhi
Testing time
Thus there is practically no reason for stress after such a thorough practice. If the children put in hard work, results will definitely come. In the end, marks alone are not the criterion for measuring anyone's intelligence.
The moral of the story for all the school children, therefore, is: No suicide, please.
Pankaj Bhanwani,
Why homework?
Mayur Vihar Phase-I Extn,
Some questions
Delhi - 110 091.
25-year wait
I deposited Rs.1,500 on 27-09-1979 for the LIG flat under Registration No. 41942. Every time I have enquired about my allotment, the DDA reply has been misleading. They state that my priority No. is 49882 and that the priority covered so far is 42256. This reply has been coming to me for more than an year now vide their letters dated June 2, July 6 and August 12, 2004. I disbelieve them all because a few of my friends who booked flats with me have got theirs long ago.
I look forward to an allotment to me now.
Sanjeev Jindal,
MCD's ways
As a senior citizen owning a flat in Vasundhara Enclave and not keeping good health, I filled up the Self-Assessment Return Form in respect of my flat, enclosed a cheque for Rs.2,417, and sent it to the property tax office at Lajpat Nagar in New Delhi under registered post on September 16, 2004. I have the postal acknowledgment to show that it was delivered at their office on September 20, 2004. Since I did not get any official receipt for the payment, I wrote to the Municipal Commissioner, Rakesh Mehta, on October 10 and followed it up with a reminder on October 30, to which there has been no response. I then sent a registered letter to the Assessor and Collector on December 9, to which also there has been no reply. Finally I wrote to the Chief Minister, Sheila Dikshit, on December 9, followed by a reminder on January 9, 2005. The Chief Minister's Office promptly forwarded these letters to the Additional Municipal Commissioner for necessary action but I have yet to hear from them.
On February 6, 2005, I sent a registered letter to the Assessor and Collector drawing his attention to the above facts and telling him that the cheque sent by me would become time-barred if not encashed by the MCD immediately and for which I would in no way be responsible. All this shows that the property tax department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is most lethargic and apathetic in its working and dealing with the public. It is a wonder how it expects to reach its collection targets!
A. Vira Raghavan,
Delhi - 110 096.
Parity, please
The menace of prenatal determination of sex and female foeticide is rampant in our urban areas. And now, with increasing awareness of the "facility" and lesser means of control under the Determination of Sex Act, the malady is fast spreading to the rural areas as well. It is no secret that, in anticipation of a male heir, rural parents go on trying for one again and again lest the land pass on to collateral male relatives. We must act quickly and sincerely to improve the state of affairs.
Kiran Narain,
(Letter for this column may be sent by e-mail to wsins@thehindu.co.in. They must carry the full postal address of the writer and should be marked "Readers' Mail".)
PGT Economics, N. K. Bagrodia School,
Rohini, New Delhi.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|