The Hindu : Opinion / News Analysis : Ratzinger "obstructed" sex abuse inquiry

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, Apr 25, 2005

Opinion

Opinion - News Analysis

Ratzinger "obstructed" sex abuse inquiry

Jamie Doward

It has emerged that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger "obstructed justice" by ordering that Church investigations into child sex abuse claims be made in secret.

POPE BENEDICT XVI faced claims on Saturday night he had "obstructed justice" after it emerged that he issued an order ensuring the Church's investigations into child sex abuse claims be carried out in secret.

The order was made in a confidential letter which was sent to every Catholic bishop in May 2001.

It asserted the Church's right to hold its inquiries behind closed doors and keep the evidence confidential for up to 10 years after the victims reached adulthood.

The letter was signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger who was elected John Paul II's successor last week. Lawyers acting for abuse victims claim it was designed to prevent the allegations from becoming public knowledge or being investigated by the police.

They accuse Cardinal Ratzinger of committing a "clear obstruction of justice."

Grave sins

The letter, "concerning very grave sins," was sent from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Vatican office that once presided over the Inquisition and was overseen by Cardinal Ratzinger.

It spells out to bishops the Church's position on a number of matters ranging from celebrating the eucharist with a non-Catholic to sexual abuse by a cleric "with a minor below the age of 18 years."

Cardinal Ratzinger's letter states that the Church can claim jurisdiction in cases where abuse has been "perpetrated with a minor by a cleric."

The letter states that the Church's jurisdiction "begins to run from the day when the minor has completed the 18th year of age" and lasts for 10 years.

It orders that "preliminary investigations" into any claims of abuse should be sent to his office, which has the option of referring them back to private tribunals in which the "functions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative can validly be performed for these cases only by priests." "Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret," the letter concludes. Breaching the pontifical secret at any time while the 10-year jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including the threat of excommunication.

The letter is referred to in documents relating to a lawsuit filed earlier this year against a church in Texas and Cardinal Ratzinger on behalf of two alleged abuse victims.

By sending the letter, lawyers acting for the alleged victims claim the cardinal conspired to obstruct justice.

Oral deposition

Daniel Shea, the lawyer for the two alleged victims who discovered the letter, said: "It speaks for itself. You have to ask: why do you not start the clock ticking until the kid turns 18? It's an obstruction of justice."

Father John Beal, professor of canon law at the Catholic University of America, gave an oral deposition under oath on April 8 last year in which he admitted to Mr. Shea that the letter extended the Church's jurisdiction and control over sexual assault crimes.

Co-signed

The Ratzinger letter was co-signed by Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone who gave an interview two years ago in which he hinted at the Church's opposition to allowing outside agencies to investigate abuse claims.

"In my opinion, the demand that a bishop be obligated to contact the police in order to denounce a priest who has admitted the offence of paedophilia is unfounded," Archbishop Bertone said.

Mr. Shea criticised the order that abuse allegations should be investigated only in secret tribunals.

"They are imposing procedures and secrecy on these cases. If law enforcement agencies find out about the case, they can deal with it. But you can't investigate a case if you never find out about it.

If you can manage to keep it secret for 18 years plus 10 the priest will get away with it," Mr. Shea added. A spokeswoman in the Vatican press office declined to comment when told about the contents of the letter.

"This is not a public document, so we would not talk about it," she said.

- Guardian Newspapers Limited 2005

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Opinion