The Hindu : Sport : India, SA take different routes

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Monday, May 30, 2005

Sport

Sport

India, SA take different routes

If Chappell is prepared to learn he might last the distance

PETER ROEBUCK

India has taken the high road and South Africa the low road as these powerful cricketing nations search for the right man to knock their teams into shape. They took different paths because their circumstances were different. India has money, an experienced captain, an established team, high expectations and a vast following. South Africa has empty pockets, a green leader, an emerging team and all manner of political complications. India sought a powerful figure. South Africa chose a diplomat.

Nor was the position vacant for the same reason. India's previous coach stepped aside after five productive years in charge. Presumably John Wright yearns for quieter pastures. They will not be hard to find.Directing traffic in Santiago is a tranquil occupation beside coaching cricket in this country.

Contrastingly, Mickey Arthur is replacing a coach of six months standing who left his position with all the enthusiasm detected in an opera buff upon hearing Mr. Sid Vicious' opening refrain.

Far apart

Clearly Greg Chappell and Arthur are not starting from the same position. They are also far apart in terms of reputation, age, playing record and disposition. Chappell was a great batsman and in retirement has remained in the public eye. He has dabbled in various activities in the manner of a man searching for something substantial to sustain him in retirement.

Arthur was a steady first-class cricketer and ever since has moved along quietly, working his way up the coaching ladder. Although he has not played Test cricket or coached an international side he does command respect and, more disconcertingly, affection.

None of which means the Australian will be the better coach. Arsene Wenger, John Buchanan, Sir Rafael Benitez count amongst those whose coaching achievements surpass their playing records. Arthur has some other advantages. He understands that nowadays cricket coaches are expected to study opposing players, pinpoint weaknesses, propose strategies, suggest precise field placements, prepare players mentally and physically and take responsibility for the support staff.

Chappell will need to fulfil these expectations or his players will stop listening after a few months. International cricket sides spend many months together living cheek by jowl and it is up to the coach and his staff to provide the stimulation needed to maintain vitality.

Well qualified

Despite his obscurity Arthur is as well qualified to coach Test cricketers as the great Australian. Chappell does, though, have one special advantage that might prove crucial. He speaks with authority. Sooner or later both newcomers will be tested. It is going to be an illuminating comparison. If Arthur is a man of steel he may prove the better appointment. If he is made of rubber then South African cricket will go down with him. If Chappell is prepared to learn he might last the distance. If not, the cracks will start to show within 12 months.

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Sport