![]() Monday, Jun 20, 2005 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The article "Playing on fear, from Godhra to Guantanamo" (June 13) is a good analysis of how lethal anti-terrorist laws can be if they are not applied with the right intention. The decision of the Central Review Committee on POTA that the Godhra incident did not attract the provisions of the Act, the acquittal of all the eight accused in the Ghatkopar blast case by a special POTA court in Mumbai, and the report that U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld approved the use of "harsh" interrogation techniques at Guantanamo Bay bear testimony to this fact. It is important that states exercise utmost caution while enacting and implementing such special laws.
Aman Mohd Kahn,
* * * The state derives legitimacy from people's fears to arm itself with the power to violate human rights. The best illustration is post-9/11 U.S. and the re-election of Narendra Modi in Gujarat.
M. Anver,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|