The Hindu : International : Climate change: fiddling as planet burns

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, Jun 24, 2005

International

International

Climate change: fiddling as planet burns

Henry Porter

There is nothing left to debate about climate change; it is happening and each of us must act

LONDON: The great lie in the climate debate is that there is still a debate worth having. Opponents of change insist that the human factors in global warming are not proven and that we must wait until we have hard evidence before taking drastic action, which is as about as silly as saying there are two equally valid views on the issue of whether paedophilia damages children.

What is so destructive about this stance is that it claims equal weight and equal airtime. The `balance' in newspaper reports, especially in the United States, is, in fact, a bias against the truth and weakens the case for immediate action against emissions of CO2. And while we hum and haw, trying to persuade reluctant sceptics, the permafrost of the Arctic melts, sea levels inch up and the pH levels of oceans gradually drop because of the carbon that is absorbed from the atmosphere.

The following quote comes from an article in the London Daily Telegraph editorial pages last month (MAY). It captures perfectly the knuckle-headed entrenchment of the last century: "Climate change is an important, perhaps vital, debate, but it remains just that. Warning of disaster has become a global industry, and the livelihoods of thousands of scientists depend on our being sufficiently spooked to keep funding their research. The worry is that many of these researchers have stopped being scientists and become campaigners instead." The author pretends to even-handedness, but his real message is that climate change is a scam to keep scientists in work.

Yet it is not scientists who are distorting the evidence, but the U.S. oil lobby and a co-operative White House. Last week, Philip Cooney, a White House staffer, was exposed by the New York Times for revising reports on global warming so that they cast doubt on the link between greenhouse gases and rising temperatures. Mr. Cooney, who has no scientific training whatsoever, resigned and took a job with Exxon Mobil, which is, incidentally, the company that produces twice the CO2 emissions of Norway and is currently facing a consumer boycott in Europe. Mr. Cooney no doubt contributed to the White House's successful efforts to sandbag Tony Blair's plan of action to tackle climate change at the G8 summit next month. You have to hand it to the U.K. Prime Minister that he accepts the advice of his scientific advisers and has done all he can in Britain's presidency of the G8 to focus world leaders' attention on the problem.

But his chum Mr. Bush remains a delinquent simpleton in such matters. In the second draft of the G8 communique, the phrase "our world is warming" has been placed in square brackets, which means that the statement is disputed by the U.S. and is likely to be excluded from the final document. American officials also pressed negotiators to delete sections which tie global warming to human activity and emphasise the risk to economies.

Cynical prevarication

James Connaughton who heads the U.S. organisation which, without a trace of irony, is called the Council on Environmental Quality, sought to reassure journalists with this statement: "It's very important to view [the deletions] in context, which overall is one of strong consensus about a shared commitment to practical action." How is the likely deletion of "we know that the increase [of the earth's temperature] is due in large part to human activity" a commitment to practical action?

U.S. policy seems to be simply one of cynical prevarication at the very least, Mr. Bush and the oil companies are hopelessly behind the times. Jeffrey Immelt, head of General Electric, the largest company in America, gave a far-sighted speech to the George Washington Business School last month and, though he did not attack Mr. Bush's policy, he made a very strong case for mandatory controls on carbon dioxide emissions. Mr. Immelt is not the kind of guy to follow some whimsical scientific fad.

— © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

International