![]() Monday, Jul 04, 2005 |
| Opinion | ||||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The article "A Bill that takes away more than it gives," (July 1) by Sheela Barse is based on a colossal misunderstanding of both the letter and spirit of the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill 2005. The Bill involves the recognition of existing cultivation (up to a maximum of 2.5 ha) and in no way suggests a fresh distribution of 2.5 ha per nuclear family. Critics may argue that this will encourage fresh encroachment on forestlands, but it is precisely to counter this that the Bill entrusts forest dwellers with conservation duties. The argument that the Bill will turn forest communities into begaaris (bonded labour) misses a fundamental point. It provides for the gram sabha to fine and punish offenders. Since many communities are already protecting forests, this will be an important weapon though it is true that it may not be effective against armed mafia and the forest department itself.
Bangalore
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |
Copyright © 2005, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|