Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Jul 13, 2005

About Us
Contact Us
National
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

National Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

An Act dogged by controversies

Vinay Kumar

Parties indulged in the game of claims and counter-claims over the past 22 years


  • The law was operative only in Assam
  • There was provision for tribunals
  • Failed to live up to its objective
  • Problem was in `implementation'

    NEW DELHI: The Illegal Migrants Determination by Tribunal (IMDT) Act, 1983, scrapped by the Supreme Court on Tuesday, has been mired in controversy and political parties indulged in the game of claims and counter-claims over the past 22 years.

    Operative only in Assam, the Act was the instrument for detection and deportation of illegal infiltrators, mainly from Bangladesh. Illegal immigration from across the border has been dominating the Assam political scene for several years. As the State goes to the polls next year, the issue will again get priority on the agenda of parties which have played politics with the Act without addressing illegal migration.

    Apprehension

    Minority leaders apprehended that genuine Indian citizens would be detected and deported if the Government abrogated the law. They fear that the Foreigners Act gives blanket powers to the police to deport a person without judicial scrutiny.

    The IMDT was applicable to Bangladeshi nationals who settled in Assam on or after March 25, 1971. The onus of proving the citizenship of a suspected illegal foreigner rested on the complainant — the police.

    However, under the Foreigners Act, the onus lies with the person suspected to be an illegal alien.

    Vocal protests

    The All-Assam Students' Union (AASU) and the Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) have been vocal in their protests against the IMDT Act, claiming it has not helped in detection of foreigners and only provided protection to a large number of infiltrators. The AASU launched the Assam agitation mainly on the issue of illegal immigration. The Assam Accord, signed with the Centre and the State Government in August 1985, brought an end to the AASU movement against foreigners and also brought the AGP to power.

    Even as the accord provided for detection and deportation of Bangladeshi migrants, so far only about 10,000 persons have been identified and hardly 2,000 deported.

    The IMDT Act had a provision for setting up tribunals in different districts having borders with Bangladesh to decide the cases against illegal infiltrators. According to estimates, there are nearly 2.5 lakh cases pending with the 16 IMDT tribunals which, after the apex court order, will be transferred to the tribunals functioning under the Foreigners' Act.

    As the IMDT Act failed to check the influx from Bangladesh, the AASU renewed the demand for scrapping the Act. But the AGP, led by Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, could do precious little during its two terms in office. It alleged that the tribunal detected only a few thousand foreigners between 1985 and 2004 but it did nothing when it was in power.

    The BJP-led NDA Government, which had promised to scrap the Act, also remained silent, taking only half-hearted initiatives. If the BJP was really concerned about the welfare of the indigenous people of Assam, why did it not convene a joint session in Parliament to repeal the law, ask political observers. The BJP did convene a joint session to enact the Prevention of Terrorism Act despite opposition from several quarters.

    On the other hand, the Congress opposed the scrapping of the IMDT Act, inviting allegations from its opponents that it was indulging in vote-bank politics.

    During his visit to Guwahati last year, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh also ruled out repeal of the Act and supported implementation of the Assam Accord in toto. While supporting the Act, Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi said the tribunals would be made more effective to deal with the problem of influx and the National Register of Citizens in Assam would be updated effectively.

    Senior government officials said every law was enacted with "good intentions'' but the problem lay in proper implementation.

    The former Governor, Lt-General (retd.) S.K. Sinha, favoured scrapping of the IMDT Act and argued for conducting ground surveys by magistrates to identify the illegal migrants. In view of their large numbers, they should be made stateless citizens without any right to vote, he said.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

    National

    News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


  • News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2005, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu