Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Sep 27, 2005
Google

National
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

National Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Sethu project not to be stayed

J. Venkatesan

Notice issued to Union Ministries, Baalu and the Tamil Nadu Government


  • No comprehensive study of environmental impact: petitioner
  • Dredging done in tsunami-hit area
  • It was a political decision to implement the project
  • Project is in the national interest: Solicitor-General

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the implementation of the Rs. 2,400-crore Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project (SSCP).

    A three-judge Bench comprising Justice Y.K. Sabharwal, Justice C.K. Thakker and Justice S.H. Kapadia, however, issued notice to the Centre and others and granted four weeks for filing of response and two weeks thereafter for rejoinder. The Bench directed that the case be listed thereafter.

    Notice was issued to the Union Environment, Shipping and Surface Transport Ministries, Shipping Minister T.R. Baalu, the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, the Tamil Nadu Government, the Tuticorin Port Trust and the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board.

    Poser to counsel

    The Bench told senior counsel Sriram Panchu, appearing for petitioner O. Fernandes, co-convener of the Coastal Action Network, "we are not going to reject." It asked him "do you want the project [to continue] or only safeguards to be followed?"

    Mr. Panchu said the mandatory Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) proceedings had been grossly violated and no comprehensive study of the impact on environment conducted. Only a rapid EIA was done.

    One million cubic feet of seabed was dredged in an area affected by the tsunami. As the post-tsunami effects were not assessed, "let them not do the dredging since over 5,400 villages will be affected," counsel said.

    He also said the Madras High Court made unwarranted observations while dismissing the petition.

    "Concerns addressed"

    Opposing the plea for stay, Solicitor-General G.E. Vahanvati and Additional Solicitor-General R. Mohan said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh inaugurated the project on July 2 only after he was satisfied that the Government had addressed all environmental concerns. The Solicitor-General said the project was undertaken in the national interest.

    He assured the court that the Government would take care of all environmental issues and safeguards.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    National

    News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


  • News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2005, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu