Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, Nov 18, 2005
Google



Andhra Pradesh
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

Andhra Pradesh - Hyderabad Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Two-day CBI custody for Monica

Special Correspondent

Do not use coercive methods to extract information, judge tells sleuths


  • Ex-starlet shifted to CBI office from Chanchalguda prison
  • Two petitions filed by Monica Bedi's lawyer dismissed
  • Investigating agency told to produce Monica on Saturday

    HYDERABAD: Monica Bedi, companion of underworld don Abu Salem, was handed over to the custody of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for interrogation by a court here for 48 hours on Thursday afternoon.

    Ms. Bedi was shifted to the CBI office at Sultan Bazar from the Chanchalguda women's prison amidst a heavy police escort at around 3 p.m. The special court for CBI cases which is trying Ms. Bedi directed the premier investigating agency to produce her on Saturday.

    The CBI executed a non-bailable warrant (NBW) against her for not appearing in court in a case related to possessing fake passport. She was brought here from Mumbai on Friday last and produced before Special Judge C.V. Subrahmanyam. She was immediately remanded in judicial custody and taken to prison.

    The CBI sought custody of Ms. Bedi for five days to complete investigation but the judge gave permission for only two days. In his order, the judge asked investigators not to use any coercive methods of extracting information. He allowed Ms. Bedi the freedom of representing to him about any harassment or coercion during CBI custody when she was produced before him.

    The judge dismissed two petitions filed by Ms. Bedi's lawyer G. Babu Rao opposing CBI custody and permitting the presence of her counsel during interrogation. He ruled that the provision of law (Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code) cited by him was not maintainable.

    On the other hand, senior public prosecutor of the CBI T. Venkata Ramana referred to the judgment of Supreme Court in the Nandini Satpathy v/s D.N. Pani case which forbids involvement of advocates in the course of interrogation.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    Andhra Pradesh

    News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


  • News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2005, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu