Opinion - News Analysis   

Kyoto holds the key

Tony Juniper

NEXT WEEK 10,000 people will start to gather in Montreal for what are expected to be the most important climate change negotiations since the agreement of the Kyoto protocol in 1997 (United Nations Climate Change Conference, Montreal, November 28 to December 9). Put simply, the scientific consensus is that only a small window of opportunity remains to avoid dangerous climate change. If Governments can take sufficient action to cut emissions within a decade or so, then there is a chance of avoiding going above the two degrees centigrade of global warming that could make climate change unstoppable, causing massive economic damage and millions of deaths. The Montreal talks, which will seek to set a framework for what happens after the first phase of the Kyoto agreement runs out in 2012, will be the key to determining the future for all life on earth.

But because of conflicting signals given to different audiences during the past few months, the role played by the British Prime Minister leaves campaigners worldwide deeply alarmed. Tony Blair, who has helped to move climate change to the top of the international agenda, has enormous influence. What he says will shape how these talks go. This is why green groups have been so utterly appalled at some of the things he has said in recent months.

Two months ago, Mr. Blair dropped a bombshell. While on a platform with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in New York, he was asked what he thought about climate change. His response departed from the long-standing EU targets-led position and lurched toward the U.S. view.

"I would say probably I'm changing my thinking about this," Mr. Blair said. "The truth is that no country is going to cut its growth or consumption substantially in the light of a long-term environmental problem. What countries are prepared to do is to try to work together cooperatively to deal with this problem in a way that allows us to develop the science and technology in a beneficial way." He added: "I don't think people are going — at least in the short term — to start negotiating another major treaty like Kyoto."

His expression of doubt about the political viability of firm pollution reduction targets clashed with the policies being expressed by his own Ministers. The George W. Bush-led "kill Kyoto" campaign and the coterie of climate change deniers seized on his words with joy. And then, earlier this month, he again set out his views. Once more, he highlighted the false choice between development and the environment, saying that a more "sensitive and flexible" framework [than Kyoto] was needed.

Last weekend, having been hammered by environment groups and governments around the world, Mr. Blair shifted his emphasis again, once more claiming a commitment to legally-binding targets. Many people will only believe him, however, if that is a consistent message— not only in his prepared speeches, but when he expresses his own opinion and in his dealings with Mr. Bush.

Mr. Blair dug the hole deeper still when he told British Parliament last week that "the Kyoto protocol expires in 2012," when in fact that year marks only the end of the first commitment period. Montreal will need to negotiate what cuts come next, and if he is saying that the Kyoto process will expire, he is undermining the prospects for success.

Yet no one doubts that climate change is clearly the one environmental issue that has consistently been on Mr. Blair's international agenda. Shortly after moving into Downing Street, and a few months before the Kyoto meeting, he observed that: "At Kyoto, industrial countries must agree legally binding targets for significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions during the first decade of the next century ... We in Europe have put our cards on the table. It is time for the special pleading to stop and for others to follow suit." Bold words — including a clear rebuff to those in the U.S. who either refused to act or denied that there was a problem.

In the end, the industrialised countries agreed in Kyoto to modest cuts to their own greenhouse gas pollution. The compliance period would be between 2008 and 2012. Countries would average their emissions over that period so as to iron out any annual anomalies and would in the interim come back and negotiate what cuts would need to follow. Britain was justifiably proud. The plan was that we would build on this track record in the run-up to Montreal.

What happens now? We need Mr. Blair to back the European Union delegation going to Montreal with a strong and clear statement about the importance of legally-binding targets, with or without the U.S., and the need to come away from Montreal with at least a process for working out what those targets will be. The outcome in Montreal will be determined by some 10,000 official participants, representing 190 national government delegations as well as environmental groups, including the international networks of Friends of the Earth, WWF and Greenpeace.

Kyoto is insufficient and has many faults. But at least there is a basis for moving forward. It sets some modest targets and broadly states the rules for meeting them. It was a monumental effort to negotiate it, another great heave to get it ratified by sufficient countries to bring it into force earlier this year. These talks will be very delicate, as in Kyoto. But now there is a heightened sense of urgency. Climate change science is sending ever more dire and desperate warnings about how long we have to take action. Given that the world is now on an ecological knife-edge, it is vital that the right signals are sent in advance of the Montreal talks. If politicians do not get it right, then the world may well be condemned to climate chaos. —

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

(Tony Juniper is director of Friends of the Earth.)

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

By-elections as political pointers
Germany's grand coalition
Support the creative self-empowered
Worker's killing exposes India's vulnerability
Russia, Ukraine headed for gas war
Iran and the IAEA
Belgaum merger: flogging a dead horse
Kyoto holds the key
Dastardly killing
A gift for the people
Low turnout
Unfair treatment

Copyright © 2005, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu