Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Jan 17, 2006
Google



Kerala
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

Kerala - Kochi Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Ramachandran's additional private secretary files petition

Staff Reporter

Challenges Lok Ayukta's prima facie finding against him


  • Petitioner claims Lok Ayukta has no power to make suo motu findings without necessary probe
  • Says Lok Ayukta could not make its own rules and code of conduct
  • Says every complaint filed before the Lok Ayukta should be accompanied by a proper affidavit

    Kochi: Former Health Minister K.K. Ramachandran's additional private secretary P. Radhakrishnan has filed a petition challenging the Lok Ayukta's prima facie finding against him in the corruption case.

    In his petition, Mr. Radhakrishnan said that the Lok Ayukta had no power or jurisdiction to make suo motu findings without holding necessary investigation/inquiry as contemplated under the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act. The Lok Ayukta could not make its own rules and code of conduct. It was bound by the Act and rules made there under.

    No provision had been made in the Act to make prima facie findings without giving opportunities of being heard to a person against whom the allegations were made, the petitioner said. Besides, the complaint on which the Lok Ayukta passed the order was not at all a proper complaint. It had not been filed in the manner prescribed in the rules. The petitioner said that as per the rules every complaint filed before the Lok Ayukta should be accompanied by a proper affidavit.

    Since the complaint was filed in violation of the Lok Ayukta rules, it should not have been entertained or treated as complaint.

    The petitioner said that the order passed by the Lok Ayukta was void for want of jurisdiction.

    According to the petitioner, what the Act provided for was filing of a final report to the competent authority after conducting an investigation into the complaint. Before conducting an inquiry, the Lok Ayukta had absolutely no jurisdiction to issue such an order. The petitioner also said that the order impleading N. Viswambharan, president of the Azhimathi Virudha Samithi, and Director of Ayurveda as petitioners was also illegal.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    Kerala

    News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


  • News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu