International   

Palestinians wrap up campaign

Hussein Agha and Robert Malley

Hamas has limits despite unprecedented wave of popularity

GAZA: There is more uncertainty than clarity surrounding Wednesday's Palestinian elections, though this much is plain: Hamas, the Islamist movement designated a terrorist organisation by the U.S. and Europe and considered a mortal enemy by Israel, will be joining the legislature. Riding an unprecedented wave of popularity and having exceeded expectations in recent municipal elections, it is on course to capture a sizable portion of votes and, who knows, a seat at the Cabinet table.

Hamas's decision to enter the political realm was long in coming but hardly a surprise. Like Fatah, the dominant secular nationalist organisation, Hamas is an offspring of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Social agenda

Unlike Fatah, its agenda was not national liberation through armed struggle and diplomacy alone. Its first priority was the Palestinians' social and religious transformation. Violence was not its only tool, any more than independence was its sole objective. Of the two, paradoxically, it is Fatah that has the more militaristic pedigree. And, in the absence of armed struggle, it is Hamas that has a political agenda to fall back on.

True, violence came to Hamas, and brutally. Its first targets were soldiers and settlers. Later, it extended operations to suicide attacks against civilians, justifying them as retaliation for the killing of Palestinian civilians. On various occasions Hamas offered — in proposals Israel dismissed as disingenuous — to stop the killing of civilians if Israel did the same.

Resort to violence itself also displayed political intuition, as attacks were carefully calibrated to the public mood. The Palestinian Authority was failing miserably to protect its people. Unable to provide security, Hamas aimed for second best. It provided revenge. Even at the armed confrontation's height, Hamas kept one eye focused on the religious, social and cultural, rallying the faithful in mosques, tending to their needs through charitable institutions. Its leaders trusted in the ultimate payoff. Discipline and ideological coherence, coupled with inevitable public disenchantment over Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, would yield dividends. Payback time, by all accounts, is now.

Vindicated by the breakdown of the peace process, the expiry of the Oslo framework, the outbreak of the Intifada, and Israel's withdrawal from Gaza,

Hamas can now join a new process without endorsing the authority's past policies. Politics offers a welcome respite from a taxing conflict with Israel that has cost most of its historic leadership.

Fatah in disarray

Besides, the Islamists' popularity has reached unmatched heights: Fatah is in disarray; the withdrawal from Gaza established in the public's mind that the Islamists' violence, not the nationalists' negotiations, produces results; and their reputation for efficiency and integrity contrasts with the authority's dismal record.

In the west, as in Israel, the prospect of Hamas's rise to power has provoked angst and anger. Its record and pronouncements certainly give reason for pause. But other factors are at play.

Over the past year, Hamas has on the whole adhered to a cessation of violence with Israel; its elected municipal representatives coordinate with the Israeli administration. —

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Palestinians wrap up campaign
Kuwaiti Prime Minister is new Emir
Rajapakse, Solheim discuss revival of talks
Blasts rock Iran's oil city
A Nizam heirloom lost
Badawi to look into grievances of non-Muslims
Orang-utan faces extinction
Call for Kenya elections
Aziz entourage frisked
India buys rocket launchers from Russia

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu