![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Feb 08, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
As the series of developments related to Iran's nuclear controversy unfolds, it is clear that the inevitable is waiting to happen the use of force and an Iraq-like situation. India, which voted in the IAEA, referring Iran to the U.N. Security Council, apparently to win America's goodwill, will have to do some clarifying in future. If the U.S. attacks Iran and requests the Indian Government for troops, will it be in a position to refuse them? Will the U.S. give us the assurance that it will facilitate the proposed gas pipeline if a pro-Washington regime is established in Iran? The P-5 have to answer whether the cause of international peace and security is served by selective concern over proliferation.
Sutirtha Sahariah,
India's foreign policy is no longer independent. Maintaining good relations with one nation should not be at the cost of good ties with another.
Vipul Mehta,
If, as a result of the vote, sanctions are eventually imposed on Iran, New Delhi will also have to share the blame for the consequent suffering. The deaths and misery caused by the sanctions on Iraq are well documented and we know what they entail.
Dilip Raghavan,
The U.S. has moved a step closer to the Iran-after-Iraq game. It is time all nations saw through the American attitude of `don't do what I do, do what I say.'
Venu C. Nair,
If a small country, Iran or North Korea, wants to increase its nuclear energy resources, it is branded as a rogue nation. The Security Council is woken up from its stupor by its permanent members and driven to take action against the country. But when America invaded Iraq for its selfish ends, the Council did nothing. All non-aligned countries and like-minded members should ask for scrapping permanent membership and veto powers. If that is not possible, they should quit the U.N.
P.K. Akhilesh,
K. Parthasarathi,
Ashish Asopa,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|