![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, Feb 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
P.T. Joseph,
C.B. Dyuthikar,
The argument that the Speaker's action is not open to challenge (Letter, Feb. 8) ignores the point made in the article that in a rule of law society, every action of any public body must conform to the law. Whatever the Speaker may claim, the fact remains that there is no provision in the Constitution that allows Parliament to terminate membership of its members through a resolution on its own judgment.
M.C. Joshi,
Here is an issue that falls exclusively in Parliament's domain. The House is supreme in deciding the behaviour of its members. The judiciary has erred in issuing notice to the Speaker. This was done probably because there was no precedent to the case. But one must not respond routinely to this extraordinary situation.
In a democracy, even criminals get a fair trial. Denying it to the expelled MPs will amount to injustice.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|