Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Tuesday, Apr 11, 2006
Google



Andhra Pradesh
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Andhra Pradesh - Others Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Apex Court tells states to resolve Babli row

J. Venkatesan

Three-Judge Bench suggests seeking intervention of Prime Minister


  • Union Water Resources Minister told to hold meetings
  • Bench hears writ plea of Nizamabad MP Yaskhi Goud
  • Construction affects 6 districts in Andhra Pradesh, says petitioner's counsel

    New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Union Water Resources Minister to hold meetings with officials of the Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra Governments with a view to resolving the dispute over the construction of Babli barrage across the Godavari.

    A three-Judge Bench, comprising Chief Justice Y.K. Sabharwal, Justice Arun Kumar and Justice D.K. Jain, while asking the Minister to hold the discussions expeditiously said that if he was not able to resolve the dispute, he could seek the intervention of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

    The Bench was hearing a writ petition filed by Nizamabad MP Madhu Yaskhi Goud and another person Nadpenna Baddam for a direction to restrain the Maharashtra Government from proceeding further with the construction of the barrage.

    Despite objections

    The petitioners contended that Maharashtra started construction of the barrage in spite of repeated objections by Andhra Pradesh and it was being done despite an agreement in the meetings of the officials to put on hold the construction.

    Tribunal award

    Senior counsel for the petitioner Dushyant Dave argued that the construction of the barrage was in violation of the Tribunal's award.

    If Maharashtra was allowed to go ahead with the construction, it would affect people of six districts of Andhra Pradesh and 18 lakh acres of land in these districts would go dry as they would be deprived of their due share of water.

    Appearing for Maharashtra, senior counsel T.R. Andhyarujina argued that the petition was not maintainable.

    `No violation'

    He said the State was not violating the 1975 agreement and Maharashtra was entitled to put up the barrage as per the agreement. He said it was a planned project for which only tenders were called for and it would take three years for its completion.

    The Bench told the counsel: "Why can't this river dispute between the two States be resolved particularly when the same political party is in power at the Centre and in the two States."

    The Bench directed the matter to be listed for further hearing on May 8.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    Andhra Pradesh

    News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


  • News Update



    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu