International - India & World   

Deal draws flak

Administration ``reneged'' on promise to share drafts of pact, alleges Senator

WASHINGTON: Senate lawmakers criticised the U.S. administration on Wednesday for not being transparent with lawmakers on a controversial civilian nuclear deal with India.

Legislators were particularly interested in an agreement being negotiated with New Delhi detailing the landmark deal clinched on March 2 by U.S. President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

The deal would allow India, which is not a signatory to the nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), access to long-denied civilian nuclear technology in return for placing a majority of its atomic reactors under international safeguards.

Speaking at a hearing on the deal, Democratic Senator Joseph Biden alleged that the administration had ``reneged'' on a promise to share drafts of the bilateral nuclear agreement.

The U.S. had sought a provision in the agreement that nuclear cooperation would be discontinued if India conducted a nuclear test but New Delhi had flatly rejected the suggestion, officials have said.

Mr. Biden said the administration also had yet to answer a deluge of questions posed by lawmakers or share with them the full list of India's civil nuclear facilities — ``even in classified form.'' He wanted the administration's ``negotiating record'' on the question of international safeguards that Indian nuclear reactors would be subject to.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global nuclear watchdog, is still negotiating with India on the safeguards.

``All parties involved in the negotiations, including the Bush administration, should facilitate the maximum amount of transparency possible, so that Congress is better equipped to make informed judgments,'' said Republican Senator Dick Lugar, who heads the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee which held the hearing.

Mr. Lugar said he had himself submitted to the administration 90 questions — apart from 82 questions that had already been answered — following an extensive April 5 Congressional testimony on the deal by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

``We appreciate the administration's attention to these questions as the committee carefully works through the intricacies of the nuclear agreement,'' he said.

For it to be effective, the nuclear agreement has to be approved by Congress.

Until the administration answered lawmakers' questions and provided them details on the deal, ``we simply should not act on its proposed legislation,'' Mr. Biden said.

Several experts have warned that forging a civilian nuclear agreement with non-NPT member India would not only make it harder to enforce rules against nuclear renegades Iran and North Korea but also set a dangerous precedent to other countries with nuclear ambitions.

``If we do this deal, ask how we will avoid offering a similar one to Brazil or Argentina if they decide on nuclear weapons acquisition, or our treaty ally South Korea,'' Robert Gallucci of Georgetown University told the hearing. — AP

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

U.S. will face global consequences: Iran
Iran nuclear chief meets IAEA officials
Chernobyl disaster haunts thousands, 20 years later
Norway, U.S. condemn Colombo blast
CLEVER car built for narrow streets
Robotic legs for stairs
Songbirds learn grammar
Curbs on Darfur suspects
Anti-terror exercise
Amid mass hunger, MPs demand pay rise
Labour at all-time low
Nuclear CBMs: India, Pakistan move forward on draft pact
India's protest ignored, Musharraf lays foundation for dam
Pakistan plumps for Bollywood's Taj Mahal
Deal draws flak

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu