![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 16, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The Congress' decision to provide outside support to the DMK Government in Tamil Nadu goes against the spirit of the people's verdict. Whether the decision is the result of the DMK's insistence or a quid pro quo arrangement for forming its government in Pondicherry, the Congress has frittered away a golden opportunity to have a say in the affairs of the State.
V. Subashini,
* * * It is ironical that the State Congress, which is part of a front that wanted an autocratic style of governance removed, was not aware of the high command's decision to extend unconditional support to the DMK Government ("Disappointment, frustration in Congress," May 13). The observation "the State leaders are seldom consulted in the finalisation of an alliance, in the seat sharing or even the selection of candidates" reinforces the Congress' style of functioning.
C.S. Balasubramanian,
* * * But for the tireless, strenuous, energetic propaganda by all the DMK allies, including the Congress, the Left and the PMK, the DPA could not have defeated the AIADMK. In all fairness, the DMK, which enjoys power at the Centre, should have shared power with its allies in the State.
M. Surveswaran,
* * *
S. Meenakshisundaram,
* * *
Congressmen had a desire to see the beginning of Kamaraj rule in the State. But it now appears they have conveniently forgotten their aim. By giving up a golden opportunity, they have failed to move towards realising their long-cherished dream.
V.K. Krishnaswamy,
* * *
The high command has chosen to ignore, for retaining the backing of 15 DMK MPs in the Lok Sabha, the legitimate aspirations of the Congressmen in Tamil Nadu. Neither the DMK nor the Congress would have won so many seats but for the alliance. The people's mandate is for a broad-based coalition, which would have been more representational and democratic.
I.S. Kanthimathinathan,
* * *
V. Nantha Kumar,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|