![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Jun 07, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to the article "What are the Indian President's powers?" (June 6). If the President is indeed a glorified rubber stamp, why did Parliament add a proviso to Article 74 (1)? It is time to delineate the specific circumstances under which the President can or cannot return a bill.
G. Jayapal,
* * * Getting an Acting President to sign a proclamation of President's Rule in nine States in one stroke sounds, even retrospectively, very unhealthy. If the President was contemplated to be a figurehead, the founding fathers would not have drawn up an elaborate procedure for his election. They would have made the President's post a nominated one, as that of Governor.
K. Panchapagesan,
* * * No doubt B.D. Jatti was a Congressman and owed all the positions he held to the party. But it is difficult to believe that a person of his standing would have declined to sign the proclamation because it would mean the death of the Congress (I). Article 356 has always been a subject of debate and the Centre's intentions have always been in doubt.
K.K. Cherian,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|