![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, Jul 06, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| New Delhi |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
New Delhi
J. Venkatesan
New Delhi: The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), the All India Bar Association (AIBA) and three State Bar Associations have resented the proceedings initiated by the Madras High Court against certain lawyers and others for taking out `pro-quota' rally inside the High Court campus. During the summer vacation, lawyers under the banner of AIBA, led by its vice-president S. Prabhakaran, took out a procession on the High Court campus on May 18 and shouted slogans demanding implementation of the 27 per cent quota for other backward classes in higher educational institutions. The High Court initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Mr. Prabhakaran and others on the ground that they violated an order passed by the High Court on March 20 and the apex court order of August 20, 2004 relating to lawyers strike. Later the contempt petition was treated as a writ petition, which is listed for further hearing on July 7, when Mr. Prabhakaran was asked to remain present in the court. In a statement, the President of the SCBA, M.N. Krishnamani said, "the High Court's move is clearly undemocratic. Like anti-reservationists had a fundamental right to express their voice under Article 19 (1) (a), pro-reservationists too have that right. Pro-reservation rallies and demonstrations are more in conformity with the constitutional provisions. While so, to prohibit a peaceful pro-reservation rally is suffocating democratic approach and method for social change." He said: "The High Court should not have initiated suo motu contempt action. It is totally uncalled for." He said such a rally had no rational connection with Harish Uppal's case (in which the apex court had deprecated lawyers' strike) where the issue was totally different. "A peaceful procession is vastly different from strike", he said. The Chairman of the AIBA, Adish C. Aggarwala, in a statement said the procession was peaceful. "It is to be kept in mind that if advocates are curtailed from expressing their views and that too on such social reform issues, it strikes at the roots of democracy and is a threat to the very liberties inherent in the legal profession." He requested the High Court to drop further proceedings in this matter. The President of Allahabad Bar Association, Chotelal Pande, President of Gujarat High Court Bar Association, Yatin Oza and Dr. Ashok Nizam of Lucknow Bar Association have also issued similar statements requesting the Madras High Court to drop further action against the lawyers who took out the peaceful procession.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|