![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Jul 18, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kerala |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs |
Kerala
J. Venkatesan
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the State Government to file its response to petitions challenging a Kerala High Court judgment upholding the ban on online lotteries in the State. A Bench of Justice Ashok Bhan and Justice Markandey Katju gave the direction while hearing special leave petitions filed by the All Kerala Online Lottery Dealers Association and the State of Sikkim questioning the ban. The Bench without issuing notice asked the State to file its reply and posted the matter for further hearing on July 31. Initially, the Government banned all lotteries in January 2005. In April 2005, the order modified the notification that the prohibition on online lotteries would continue, but sale of paper lotteries conducted by the States, including Kerala, would be permitted. Both a Single Judge and a Division Bench of the High Court upheld such a ban. The present appeals are directed against this judgment dated May 23. The petitioners contended that the State did not have legislative competence to ban online lotteries alone while permitting sale of paper lotteries. They said the impugned notification, apart from being in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, was clearly contrary to the scheme of the Lotteries Regulation Act (LRA), 1998, and the judgment of the apex court. They said the finding of the High Court that there was a marked distinction between online lottery and paper lottery and hence banning one and continuing the other could not be termed discriminatory was contrary to the very scheme of the LRA. It must be noted that the LRA contemplated only one class of lotteries and the Legislature in its wisdom had brought within its purview all kinds of lotteries without any distinction. They contended that if there was any violation, the State concerned should complain to the Union Government and it could not take action on its own. The High Court had committed an error in upholding the ban, they said and sought a direction to quash the impugned judgment and an interim stay of its operation.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|