![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, Jul 22, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Karnataka |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Karnataka
-
Bangalore
Staff Reporter
EXPECTATIONS BELIED: `The Da Vinci Code' failed to match the hype generated prior to its release. Photo: K. Murali Kumar
Bangalore: Mario Puzo's "The Godfather", Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code", Rabindranath Tagore's "Chokher Bali", and J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series what is common to all these books is that they have been made into movies. With the number of films based on books steadily increasing, it leaves readers in a quandary; which medium of communication is better? Film directors are enthralled by the subjects of the literary world, the most recent inspiration being "The Da Vinci Code". A lot of hype was generated before the movie was released, which the Church first expressing reservations about the film and later terming it a work of fiction. To Sakiba, a mass communication student in the city, the film was disappointing. "The book was such a treat, the experience of unravelling the facts while reading was nail-biting, which the movie failed to achieve." "Films are made from the director's and script writer's perspective," says Priya, a career consultant. Closer home, Sanjay Leela Bhansali's "Devdas" based on Sarat Chandra's classic novel was a complete distortion from the original where he contrived the meeting of the two women protagonists unlike the book where they never meet. Nazia, an HR personnel, says: "Have you watched Amityville Horror? It's not even half as frightening as the book, despite the movie having an edge through visuals. The book gave me jitters for a whole week." "The Dracula" series is now considered a classic in its genre. For Karishma, software professional, "films are fun to watch but a book helps me think unlike the former which leaves me dormant and that's why I prefer a book any day to a film." On the contrary, Keerti, student, thinks films are better. "Visuals have more impact and they stay in our memory for a longer duration. A book may even be detailed in its description which may not be necessary for the story but watching it on screen undoubtedly saves time."
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|