Opinion - News Analysis   

Doubts over NORAD evidence to 9/11 inquiry

Oliver Burkeman

The military did not even hear about United flight 93 until after it had crashed.

AMERICA'S MILITARY top brass may have deliberately misled the 9/11 commission, painting a picture of a swift response to the unfolding terrorist attacks when, in reality, fighter jets spent crucial minutes pursuing a non-existent aeroplane, it emerged on Wednesday.

Tape transcripts published for the first time in this month's Vanity Fair magazine show in vivid new detail how air defence commanders sent two armed planes — out of only four at their disposal to defend a quarter of the country — on a wild-goose chase. Meanwhile, contrary to what the commission was told, the military did not even hear about United flight 93 until after it had crashed.

Members and staff of the 9/11 commission believe the discrepancies may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead, and they discussed asking the justice department to consider criminal charges against senior members of the military, sources told the Washington Post.

Thomas Kean, the former New Jersey Governor who led the commission, described what his panel had been told by the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) as "just so far from the truth."

Major General Larry Arnold and Colonel Alan Scott told Mr. Kean's panel that NORAD started tracking United 93 at 9.16 a.m. In fact, the plane was not hijacked until 12 minutes after that and, as the tapes grimly illustrate, it was 10.15 a.m. before technical specialist Sergeant Shelley Watson, a NORAD employee, first heard the news from civilian air traffic control in Washington. "He's down," an air traffic controller tells her on the tape, though she at first misunderstands. "When did he land? Because we have confirmation ..."

"He did ... he did ... he did not land," the controller replies. "Oh, he's down?" Sgt Watson replies, as the truth dawns.

The tapes seriously damage the credibility of the claim, made repeatedly by the Vice-President, Dick Cheney, that the White House had weighed the question of giving authorisation for flight 93 to be shot down if necessary.

In fact, Mr. Cheney knew of the hijack barely a minute before the plane crashed. The authority to give the order was provided by the President at 10.18 a.m. — after the attack had ended.

They also provide further evidence against the conspiracy theory that the military shot the plane down: the tapes show NORAD could never have been in the position to do so. In fact, two fighter jets wasted part of the morning pursuing a ghost: NORAD chiefs believed that American flight 11 had fallen beneath their radar and was heading to the U.S. capital, even though it had already crashed into the World Trade Centre. A crucial part of the problem, one civilian aviation manager said, was that American Airlines refused to confirm for several hours that its flight 11 had hit the building.

Colonel Robert Marr, the commanding officer in charge of NORAD's north-eastern division, said no deception had taken place. "I can't think why we'd want to spin that," he told Vanity Fair. —

© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Sri Lanka on the brink
Reining in distorting subsidies
War clouds darken the outlook for peace
Integrating the U.S.-India circuit
638 ways to kill Fidel Castro
Doubts over NORAD evidence to 9/11 inquiry
Corrections and Clarifications
The elusive mole
Horror stories
Shocking
Good news
Education for all

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu