![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, Nov 24, 2006 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| New Delhi |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs |
New Delhi
Sandeep Dikshit
NEW DELHI: The lure of the private sector is leading to an increasing rise in the number of armed forces officers seeking premature discharge from the services. But faced with a shortage of officers, the Government has been reluctant to relieve officers in larger numbers, say defence sources quoting figures. Last year, over 1,000 officers wanted to quit the armed forces including over 500 from the Army, about 300 from the Indian Air Force (IAF) and about 200 from the Navy, said defence sources. The figures have shown a steady increase since 2002 when 432 officers wanted to quit the services, followed by 767 in 2003 and 800 in 2004. Faced with a shortage of officers, the Government has kept the number of officers relieved of service at more or less steady. In 2005, 708 officers were allowed to leave service as against 649 in 2004, 634 in 2003 and 318 in 2002. Despite the steady rise in officers wanting to leave the armed forces, no study has so far been conducted to interpret the trend, defence sources added. In the IAF, 246 pilots were permitted to quit service in the last three years, most apparently attracted by higher pay scales in private airlines. However, the IAF says the majority of pilots released from service have already completed their useful tenure as pilots and their exit does not affect the operational status of squadrons. Against an authorised strength of 3,278 pilots, 3,068 pilots are in position. The vacancy of 210 pilots cannot be termed large as it does not affect operational requirements, it contends.
Increase in suicide levels
The number of suicides in the Army has touched a record 128 during the current year. The highest suicide figures so far in a calendar year take the cumulative number of suicides by Army personnel since 2003 to nearly 500. The figures do not include incidents of soldiers running amuck and killing their colleagues or officers. According to defence sources, among those who committed suicide this year were five officers including a gallantry award winner, five junior commissioned officers (JCOs) and 118 jawans. The comparative figures were 120, 116 and 119 (including 15 attempted suicides), respectively, for the previous three years. The Army, however, says service conditions were marginally responsible for the suicides. In most cases, soldiers killed themselves due to personal and family problems like marital discords, extra marital affairs by the soldier or the spouse, medical problems, depression and property issues. The Army has embarked on a nine-point action plan to reduce suicides with senior officers especially asked to monitor the initiatives. Among the steps is an attempt to reduce the semi-feudal relationship between officers and men by stepping up interaction, improved accessibility of commanders and prompt response to grievances.
Liberal leave policy
The Army has also liberalised the leave policy to allow soldiers to attend to urgent domestic problems and has started posting Army Medical Corps JCOs as psychological counsellors to interact with troops and alleviate stress related problems. Though the Army may claim that professional reasons were not behind soldiers committing suicide, internal probe reports in two cases of soldiers running amok (fratricide) suggest otherwise.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|