Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Jan 03, 2007
ePaper
Google



Karnataka

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs |

Karnataka - Bangalore Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Trial in Pratibha's case begins

Staff Reporter

She was raped and murdered by a driver in December 2005


  • The evidence was recorded in-camera
  • Evidence of forensic expert and doctor to be recorded


    BANGALORE: A fast track sessions court on Tuesday commenced hearings in the case relating to the murder of Pratibha Murthy, an employee of a business process outsourcing firm.

    Judge K. Sukanya of the 7th Fast Track Sessions Court recorded the evidence of C.V. Gowda of the Centre for DNA Fingerprints and Diagnostics. The evidence was recorded in camera. The court is also expected to record evidence of the forensic expert and the doctor who did the autopsy. Mr. Gowda is among the few important prosecution witnesses.

    Pratibha, who was working in a leading call centre in Electronics City, was kidnapped, raped and murdered on the outskirts of the city, off Kanakapura Road on December 12, 2005. The accused, Shiva Kumar, was the driver of a cab hired by the company to transport its staff.


    Shiva Kumar drove Pratibha to an isolated area in Anjanapura New Layout, about six km from her house, and allegedly murdered her, according to police. He threw the body in an isolated area, which was found three days later.

    On Tuesday, the recording of Mr. Gowda's evidence was delayed following S. Shankarappa, counsel for Shiva Kumar, objecting to the commencement of the trail with C.V. Gowda's evidence. Mr. Shankarappa contended that the evidence had to begin from witnesses who had seen the body. He said the DNA test was done after filing of the charge sheet.

    Special Public Prosecutor K. Janardhan objected and said Pratibha's case was solely based on circumstantial evidence, wherein each circumstance need to be proved. "The DNA test report throws light on the molestation and rape of Pratibha. The discovery of the body was altogether different," he said.

    The Public Prosecutor later told The Hindu that Mr. Gowda's evidence was in camera as there would be certain personal references regarding the rape and murder of Pratibha. Pratibha's husband Pavan Murthy, her mother and uncle were present in the court.

    Printer friendly page  
    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



    Karnataka

    News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
    Advts:
    Classifieds | Jobs | Updates: Breaking News |



  • News Update


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

    Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu